Re: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D59C1A874E for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:12:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjAMZGsbBQDC for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:12:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3B91A1EFA for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:12:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f206so31056984wmf.0 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:12:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:thread-index:content-language; bh=aTXFIV+iZaf0tfZx4tg34K6zGoqzjOTlKWqrh0TpWhM=; b=YSb5UffmCr086K5ITnLHilNzJ4RUmP0IOMhwFRI1dcO3Oz4fCK3fXoALDDz/cgODai zGdvR0e40SVFfJ0KTAdy5Pkzm/3jOcKR+lNKQUYyZ2z9op50+1dCIUQtdaZ7rDAgxIhc MOOaSY34e412sAF7IPK/C8+izndsWukO+igOkogO1wVClmtitCbTz8QK+UbtgDZImldy I1u0quqDoiSuje/9BZKE6DkLhusv9GZNNzBAFkE6TqvtDGkT7Fq5ZDXThHTAYBS9VM/I C6WQzLoK++XWnWETS3LvhtnFISJcWXIU3qM4CxKUCAfnPE72LCJ8wMnnaTiZitZBkn9k GuuQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.68.68 with SMTP id r65mr5396575wma.95.1452013918876; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-109-67-23-123.red.bezeqint.net. [109.67.23.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xx3sm33045386wjc.32.2016.01.05.09.11.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:11:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC8D0F@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEDD449@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEDD449@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:11:54 +0200
Message-ID: <016001d147dc$2e03e740$8a0bb5c0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0161_01D147EC.F18DEFC0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHT/wrGLhiLkBLV2YmKI4sv10jSnAL+hxJVns/F8hA=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/H0dxB7Tke1sVU6pecw34Oe0BD-s>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:12:03 -0000

Hi,

I support option 1

Roni

 

From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan
(Dan)
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 2:34 PM
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc

 

Hi,

 

There were no responses to this query. Please express your opinions on the
mail list whether we should continue as planned with the approval for this
I-D. 

 

Possible options (other may apply): 

 

1.       Continue as planned

2.       Do not continue

3.       Continue, but first do . 

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Dan

 

 

From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan
(Dan)
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 12:55 PM
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc

 

Hi, 

 

As you may have seen an IPR disclosure that pertains to
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc was submitted recently. The announcement
on the XRBLOCK mail list with  more information can be read at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg01914.html
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darc
hive_web_xrblock_current_msg01914.html&d=BQMFAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I
4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=JT0PNFMVTwcCOwfJFWR9rPXwWO3aXrz
-8hcAnDMibu4&s=Y212mtSrLAN6yGGEigFnx-qwjZv_a0r5MpWucZswumg&e=> .  
 
This I-D was on the agenda of the IESG telechat this Thursday 12/17. Our AD
decided to defer this I-D to the next telechat scheduled for January 7, 2016
and asked us to confirm on the mail list that the WG still plans to proceed
with the I-D. 
 
Taking into account this new information - do the participants in the WG
want to proceed with the approval of this Internet-Draft? Please state your
opinions on the WG mail list until Monday January 4, 2016. 
 
Thanks and Regards,
 
Dan