Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-11-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/n_Ysy6iFA-EHW_miIfjEwQq_ivM/
3383081
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-11-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/X0MVq57eiZeUptrvhVYMCuG58no/
3380915
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-10-30
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/o4vqdhns6ghr7VHHqSuheSnXA6o/
3376536
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Cullen Jennings
2023-10-29
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/1vsJ-uvQA_EQWmYOjV60wGrzXLI/
3375548
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-10-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/fEAnnOSW9MW7y1RtJOAgbEUGuwo/
3375416
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-10-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/y5lYrs3q_1UrVrQseKF8ol52x90/
3375305
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-10-27
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/zQLVJKcB4wC8sZ8xH40qIRbr968/
3375136
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-10-17
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/NY-PlGPdULb5OeyVWFHu9j4p5Jg/
3369262
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Sean Turner
2023-10-17
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/3fMT_ue6dKqzg9Pv47ZV0fDQ8gU/
3369259
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-10-10
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Ei9HWNfzBBuU5mO1Phl3Z07UX7Y/
3366440
2089525
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Lorenzo Miniero
2022-04-04
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/G5gJ_Wu7J7SYPr96CzqGVVcgUUM/
3167009
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-04-04
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/3chkpNByOS_1__AwvLfdwUuLWVA/
3166993
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Lorenzo Miniero
2022-03-29
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/vDCNirDaFB_0k_ZQjDPhepuVfE8/
3164802
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-03-28
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/oXHrLGJ74bIW_QFxL0E_kYVjUr8/
3164418
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Simon Pietro Romano
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/kcxVnYJR_rm6C92P4Rl3wfMexbQ/
3162327
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/J6aHr2E9ZHmcyhwyL3rszAgcxM4/
3162302
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Justin Uberti
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/KpKANpdrNHh8_1VrRJ3WfnSVr7g/
3162100
2004575
[Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?[Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Cullen Jennings
2022-03-22
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/S7ww0KiL0fRFN04h2AQQ6yjJjfw/
3162012
2004575
Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: multiple fingerprints for a certificateRe: [rtcweb] JSEP: multiple fingerprints for a certificate
Cullen Jennings
2016-08-25
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/3oFDCy1Jw-j_sn8L_JwakuWTBQU/
2254177
1584288
Re: Testing ULAnessRe: Testing ULAness
Brian E Carpenter
2016-06-08
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/rPFyCt3-M_CFExFHr53G8p45_f4/
2220536
1436847
Re: Testing ULAnessRe: Testing ULAness
Bob Hinden
2016-06-07
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/AgCjZbVJKaudA_-ouAtRx8_fyjI/
2220518
1436847
Re: [MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)Re: [MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)
Alan Johnston
2016-05-24
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/W1bUjZZ70bg5LQ4E3GVsZBa7u3I/
2213432
1490821
Re: [MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)Re: [MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)
Ben Campbell
2016-05-23
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/etPlkwniOmYgWgJQJsAGmMo8QZY/
2212922
1490821
Re: [MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)Re: [MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)
Alan Johnston
2016-05-23
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/X46z9izV0umjNIxPSrsLLCCKoZg/
2212907
1490821
[MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)[MMUSIC] zrtp-hash (was Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12)
Ben Campbell
2016-05-23
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/cqp1AR-QlC4HxPbyWEDUXEsymW0/
2212899
1490821
Re: [MMUSIC] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12Re: [MMUSIC] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12
Ben Campbell
2016-05-20
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/B3DGPSrFmRzHH9HYirkv5y7M6EM/
2211794
1490910
Re: [MMUSIC] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12Re: [MMUSIC] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-12
Suhas Nandakumar
2016-04-20
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/LmUOrc7LFuPIAqHJu5iV9iytEYU/
2197577
1490910
Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)
Adam Roach
2016-02-01
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/Dxdl9t2nRp3jA1zaJzpmSngkjLc/
2152347
1491014
Re: [MMUSIC] RID Open Issue 2: Definition of BitrateRe: [MMUSIC] RID Open Issue 2: Definition of Bitrate
Roni Even
2015-11-02
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/1bjqxxPExq_7S3MYknPSjdObqwc/
2108186
1490997
Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)
Magnus Westerlund
2015-10-23
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/WmYBbYbdRCOORhwwFd4O1_8Tlb4/
2102685
1491014
Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)
Adam Roach
2015-10-22
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/jXPuwBX1vrvF3NgLmpK7G_Vtey0/
2101756
1491014
Re: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bisRe: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Suhas Nandakumar
2015-10-05
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/nAIKfRLzbgaxLjU_S6-iNSbbppY/
2091317
1491069
Re: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bisRe: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Paul Kyzivat
2015-10-05
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/NxII9GJRZPgIrFg66OIBGbt6ZQs/
2091282
1491069
Re: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bisRe: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Ali C. Begen
2015-10-05
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/QZ3WLEPw2R4N3n9KLLK3xNAkgxQ/
2091225
1491069
Re: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bisRe: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Paul Kyzivat
2015-09-28
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/ZmHZjAI0sBNUodBgDRjJJCwNh8o/
2087980
1491069
Re: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bisRe: [MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Ali C. Begen
2015-09-28
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/Rx2lLtnv2l47IW1XlW6j59rSbBc/
2087937
1491069
[MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis[MMUSIC] Making b=CT session level only - draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
Magnus Westerlund
2015-09-10
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/wwhU2jOsbgzqvKJ0IPIxsBcti44/
2081018
1491069
Re: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributesRe: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributes
Paul Kyzivat
2012-12-31
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/m_oPLsyyivpY7dNC82ai_UZQfzY/
956087
1492143
Re: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributesRe: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributes
Ali C. Begen (abegen)
2012-12-30
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/RdeNuFC6bP7QbArkSBdCAbFBhDI/
956086
1492143
Re: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributesRe: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributes
Paul Kyzivat
2012-12-30
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/220BNhGma-9JNdg1sz9JuiwBzes/
956085
1492143
103 Messages