Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a changeRe: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CFWOQqqK9USGb3u9wAe3cu_EoXw/
2920781
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domainsRe: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Jesse Thompson
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LAxCB6H6bf1YtScEw1dRENQkot8/
2920779
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
Neil Anuskiewicz
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1o-DQLMDq_dwBypivApLHDdvTpI/
2920756
1908588
Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domainRe: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain
Seth Blank
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/a5kuqMY4S6wM_JSdEcD2A6QSBik/
2920734
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domainRe: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain
Dave Crocker
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2wHsyPDRqC1Gxr5Sll0yP-Gg3wI/
2920728
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domainRe: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain
Dave Crocker
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/H4-X_tYi6oxf8VRuIeGfY5aO_3g/
2920725
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domainRe: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain
Tim Wicinski
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mGQDV7qQdoqmnSZ1f4M4JlxH8K4/
2920724
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domainRe: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain
John R Levine
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ub7xyy75kX8kRTpNjLXMCpExa0s/
2920722
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenariosRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenarios
Dotzero
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Om0zbTH6dzM0PfDpwvsKt96p3QI/
2920604
1909688
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenariosRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenarios
Douglas E. Foster
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3Otm2wHNdokT7yeIjvsj89M0mZ4/
2920559
1909688
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenariosRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenarios
Alessandro Vesely
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_BSkVUvF-At8r49k25b-gxiPz-c/
2920542
1909688
Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domainsRe: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Autumn Tyr-Salvia
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GMOjq3KcPGhH3iUGY8zwwVhmnoA/
2920540
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domainsRe: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Alessandro Vesely
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/V2r_Ikh0G_UvmVs0x3QvXYvFz7Q/
2920535
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenariosRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenarios
John Levine
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/17phQAl3VKrOFcZ8M_pQ845XP4Y/
2920449
1909688
[dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenarios[dmarc-ietf] DMARC failure scenarios
Douglas E. Foster
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oE52EGJdu2eeM8l1evccC8NrCLs/
2920440
1909688
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a changeRe: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
Dotzero
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Wfxl7IXwSNdUs6BN64jP_7uY1pE/
2920425
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a changeRe: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
Dave Crocker
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/stfJa8jb0i2yn3bxpPBmvBvDA60/
2920421
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a changeRe: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yE90QqiaOKbleB5c8EIIgcQt4B4/
2920416
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-08-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/jhcE4JEeUHBK2GM-hLdI-s89sJE/
2920412
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domainsRe: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Jesse Thompson
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vAxSUxgaEANWFYUSDadql7S6YJg/
2920385
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, was non-mailing listRe: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, was non-mailing list
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wlxbD8MhOKx51NYy2eWA8qMZpD0/
2920374
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domainsRe: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Jesse Thompson
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-95Be_mh7maNxvbso1ez301X4Uc/
2920367
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
John Levine
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ERTPgvSU2cSFcZ0FxQnMgSOvOF4/
2920290
1908588
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
Luis E. Muñoz
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JrttlbKJsC9n_7Tct0Cq5SoHMLw/
2920274
1908588
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/P7qp9jNFx9oGSHRMKPI_JhlW7R8/
2920251
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dotzero
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/X4IcTA6L9RdWEUxdmHFGjhIpz0w/
2920245
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BjdLGS8Z7KXU52Ij10z27j18Txo/
2920233
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Rolf E. Sonneveld
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TvVfIofOv3_-b2FEYg_h995hj4A/
2920231
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Alessandro Vesely
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ndxJ-LEFWTXuxOeqp8inYJj4s8Y/
2920230
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Alessandro Vesely
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tG5ES2pIEs95uHMOfEAVZAbtlY4/
2920216
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dotzero
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/gCYgdPs7iRaMhSDssINWbDMSw-g/
2920121
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yaEGUG757VPhqJc8HolsIMJAXpM/
2920115
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dotzero
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2LZk4wzSprwlp_Aq1EyGfe1bUVs/
2920114
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dotzero
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EDIhXIMlF8ruMjDQ4Kv35iPBLEc/
2920108
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7DEy0RPwmpGAJoG0ktID9mtk49o/
2920105
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Laura Atkins
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ukJ_PxHy4h0T7eXsKIhMxCFSdDI/
2920090
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a changeRe: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
Dotzero
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/m8KI8bQ2kGEYI9JgjlbXAoxBmFg/
2920086
1906638
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Joseph Brennan
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ecgHssvUjFfVxDH7lJMCI1gpnac/
2920080
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dotzero
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_AWhEX5tE2U_WHJ6ix5Rjj_Q9Bs/
2920077
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-08-17
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/16nx7sCMp4WnEGPhiN8UakCC2aU/
2920076
1908582