Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4B73A16BD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Kk4UOrsXriR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C6E3A16A9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id s23so12507966qtq.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fE73BaZlms6rFQ6nQjGRKiOdUL+Cuc9bztwVNfK1Vk4=; b=phLJtqvpPov8AB4gc7qsb8AZx4NqqnAEB5XwmNzMqcHjEXYoXbqzU1ZFSTOoqWqXDr g0LMGFw075fshVgeHwWR+cG5eQvWWXYmkBIWr7ov8xLXRBefZz/pcsFNOKURsu9//MyX G7ISJCMZlX8L5KUBNBuXxpMQS1Hcvi/uFKUxcRDwOwENigigiEwM2ZV34+AJXJm+HOid S++PTxHqVZUzW5EVva4Vb+u0qSTP5nvsRBGnITYFkieudARMN3820jEerMydFqylCESK nZtSS4WEFuIjqPmq6Zcls01G5fc4BTwAgxdlt2Bgoh9937vgcMNWurp0Kj0tU1qslrvP L5sA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fE73BaZlms6rFQ6nQjGRKiOdUL+Cuc9bztwVNfK1Vk4=; b=fcGRNpwD1EG2gc33Q36pO5Ifs3vsSRikbvKhm6qnlbO7uJfgGrBCmSxsY3Njgb8pqD l3S+wrep/dWv+/Mh/8mkp6WuMnVcvIhz3XE1B11CnZt2gZZvQ1ieow/xmkCbQZUkeuUE jlvzUWngOwhJJChnhg3CZfwRPDWrdT4V4aQH/7zPKlGeg4DIcc6K9Sddq3HfuglVoA+i CRtjTMs2n7RquWsnvWIVBI6gDepzxemioMKbCBhB+GgPTefD5YtYUTZjVvpjmkB1Zo0a kOtcsG7HF6rgIoLRVUp0yz1PWCEJ7WNXL8S86eV6ux5Z5vey7fv35uth2IPr+6EV4KBO BzUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hRl5sLDaosbmdDfdd0PZ9QoZlDMf6s55qTOR8rykEhPQuKAJX bVmAPgd6ew5DD8LfIVUy7/CCufSM8Nrsh5muwQw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBGRUEPqV0lsCwW3pGYlSHD8+Uu8gZ7/04rfdV9GziM/n8/XvUxDDobjDox6r9Keyl0rl0DiC3XgB4SL7fQMU=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2258:: with SMTP id o24mr13898727qtc.220.1597675049751; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJ4XoYcFbh8-nAxjxzzRgUahFfhcgcZQ2yMF2ewv_-DgUmhL=g@mail.gmail.com> <20200814164237.313071E971DB@ary.local> <CAJ4XoYeqj_5mpZu1PZP4rNfrWRyC5gC-2dfK7oX9xQHiR24QeA@mail.gmail.com> <085c6a5f-5451-ae8c-4873-133673ba1754@tana.it> <CAL0qLwaVUi9QtV4zcCwncuy4N3YPwsGZPzFfd1q19io79UG2VQ@mail.gmail.com> <c1844590-4b12-9763-21c5-6ac5b730321b@tana.it> <6358f3da-806b-f4eb-b9a0-8ee8ce4121d7@dcrocker.net> <4e549ca6-6047-6ff2-325c-fe8d7247e157@tana.it> <c972e0af-b589-1780-47b3-8cb2a2024ec2@dcrocker.net> <13a0ed72-2c5a-8ba6-84ab-b857e29403f1@tana.it> <b5935bde-e8-78ef-ed17-90a1d730aa9d@taugh.com> <8CCCBF0C-8651-4298-BB29-457381655D1D@wordtothewise.com> <beba49bc-e599-4f5b-72ad-2328938af9da@tana.it> <7FC8E909-1A13-4682-B3D8-EAD76F2B02BB@wordtothewise.com> <CAJ4XoYcx=doEfrN2M=X8OZQF0Nq+AFRLYqTgrsr1zMFSJVwziw@mail.gmail.com> <7C25FA42-6C6B-45B9-8476-B74F2455EDDC@wordtothewise.com> <5e4c9533-52cb-5923-54b3-fcc2bf80bc20@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <5e4c9533-52cb-5923-54b3-fcc2bf80bc20@dcrocker.net>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:37:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYdTTMrqeGA2tj8Pp+Ef4VYXU5F4AB5uwRN6SRVHuOya5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: Laura Atkins <laura@wordtothewise.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce9a0d05ad13b58b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2LZk4wzSprwlp_Aq1EyGfe1bUVs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:37:39 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:27 AM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 8/17/2020 7:00 AM, Laura Atkins wrote:
>
> I think the most
>  useful thing we can say about the FTC workshops is that they were a
> forcing mechanism that instigated a lot of effort and innovation in the
> space. Some of those efforts fell by the wayside and some still persist.
>
>
> You think? I’m not sure I’d agree. I saw the workshop as mostly a
> political (and educating the politicians) exercise. The effort and
> innovation were already there and being done by a lot of people who weren’t
> there. I’m kinda bemused by the importance folks have assigned to it in
> relation to the vastly different email ecosystem we have today.
>
>
> This might be quibbling, but I think it kicked a bit more energy into the
> anti-abuse industry.  So, as a moment to mark in time, it I think it was
> useful.  But no, not fundamentally for the creation and development of
> email anti-abuse work.
>
> d/
>

Exactly. +1

Michael Hammer