Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

[Alessandro Vesely <[e-mail]>]

On Fri 14/Aug/2020 21:08:56 +0200 Jim Fenton wrote:
> 
> If the Sender header field is to be used by DMARC in the manner
> described in this draft, it should be an integral part of the DMARCbis
> specification rather than a separate extension to it. In other words,
> this should be an issue on the DMARC WG issue tracker rather than a
> working group draft (and presumably eventual RFC). There are enough
> different combinations of originators and receivers that might use
> Sender (which the chart in Section 2 begins to describe) that we don't
> need the ongoing ambiguity of whether the receiver does or does not
> implement this as an extension.


100% agreed.  However, since I haven't yet understood how exactly the 
spec is going to be split among various I-Ds, I voted for adoption in 
order to boost discussion.


Best
Ale
--