IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 16 August 2020 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4171D3A0A3F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 02:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HPChYoqMl_gi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 02:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D76C3A0A12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 02:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1597570886; bh=6IPl1nJM1yfAYs2z3iJRG4+G9eB0QlY1sClmIljbr+k=; l=173; h=From:To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BehpVv/leUhKagDvvfZdWXgW6qpaOlqA/+TziM4b0/1hlVFzgK8nV+DPQ5NDkGcSz C9v5SbFvKAA8glCOQlVk68X40sADw3duSkFCvGyUoAKukAYDFEIes1oeAFtdLQksRg F5ye96KhphvHkKw/goghsC5DTKgCr7fngKNL4HRG31iuIsJfJDI7Juz7xgIL9
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([5.170.69.62]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC08B.000000005F38FF46.00001252; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 11:41:26 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
References: <CAJ4XoYcFbh8-nAxjxzzRgUahFfhcgcZQ2yMF2ewv_-DgUmhL=g@mail.gmail.com> <20200814164237.313071E971DB@ary.local> <CAJ4XoYeqj_5mpZu1PZP4rNfrWRyC5gC-2dfK7oX9xQHiR24QeA@mail.gmail.com> <085c6a5f-5451-ae8c-4873-133673ba1754@tana.it> <CAL0qLwaVUi9QtV4zcCwncuy4N3YPwsGZPzFfd1q19io79UG2VQ@mail.gmail.com> <c1844590-4b12-9763-21c5-6ac5b730321b@tana.it> <6358f3da-806b-f4eb-b9a0-8ee8ce4121d7@dcrocker.net> <4e549ca6-6047-6ff2-325c-fe8d7247e157@tana.it>
Message-ID: <4e298568-6ba3-0f71-9999-d4b4e1b2654c@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 11:41:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4e549ca6-6047-6ff2-325c-fe8d7247e157@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4L1kkIxQomveb6IA4FD69cdoSWw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:41:31 -0000

On Sun 16/Aug/2020 10:23:45 +0200 I wrote:
> FTC Email Authentication Summit in November 2004, as Doug recalled.


Sorry, of course I meant Michael.


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email