IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65963A14D1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=mbwkwLSg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=GpJRXglT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzA0O9mpiTb2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F1B3A0D47 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D211F80284 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1601351898; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=6QblQdWP9yM69QPqHOolziKdbz3cfzxCVNsAio59T+M=; b=mbwkwLSgPQYEHMQRC9I8K7pSlB5zLKAjOOuzmTon3xPqkVfcntTWT3XTp2GVDPwK998lZ 4qgXjS/1nl5LAqMAQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1601351898; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=6QblQdWP9yM69QPqHOolziKdbz3cfzxCVNsAio59T+M=; b=GpJRXglT4nf/HtKR2LtvmDR18jWZbqfhbYWb/Rv8LwKn8ZP528shyitNvKI2t2MXMWVu7 6ioPLB5SzZO+ewBDB7H5ywAww5L8FL8gTdcExEZig4n8FjqVkmrBNVoRqPzj5TdI86aPKwU AiPbJoh+MFSNB9aiAQu3gOsTOG/oSxaBlvSdl/QtgNpyWTEtt0VXdCf7eEx7PQJsLJNezUk Z/FIhMPwBczefEWt0GIhOUSq69qDpPNxIqMgH9GUbI5Ot2LzzcrhKM14OLFH7Ko4vSgLZcy NZN/noXkfSLSrpOLvYtMEOuOwdu8LDWY9bxBPJsW53qwjkeNrDWw7cfA5kjQ==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108C5F801D5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:58:17 -0400
Message-ID: <2666392.pzbeVk75JJ@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <de05659a-91ed-0c76-3d8d-766d85475585@dcrocker.net>
References: <20200927171611.838B321D9BAD@ary.qy> <33363154.Bvymkppg8h@zini-1880> <de05659a-91ed-0c76-3d8d-766d85475585@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/LwFRfD0xizcTyHyVFVIcmFr97-Y>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 03:58:24 -0000

On Monday, September 28, 2020 8:54:05 PM EDT Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 9/28/2020 5:32 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > but
> > pretending like DMARC policy doesn't exist is not.
> 
> Claims of pretending seem to be popular just now.  the problem seems to
> be adequately explaing  the pretending.
> 
> So to contribute the response portion of this ritual:
> 
>     1. No one is pretending anything.
> 
>     2. Since you believe otherwise, please document it.
> 
> d/

What we are supposed to be working on right now is:

> Review and refinement of the DMARC specification.

I don't think elimination of policy considerations is a mere refinement.  I 
think the burden lies with the one trying to create a change in the protocol.  
That's not me, so I don't think there's anything more to say on this.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email