IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438333A0BD7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZzMonbhXpHPX for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0E773A0BB3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id y11so7683499qvl.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VvZWvdq2hjhTiMiCs4bnFUE4kYUsQlszs3o6b8U4O0s=; b=iaQCbGbtK3wu02NOdrFBfpwxpGu21phiRDFirXxxP07AcaP1Yz3nBXw4PJPhDd92s5 iuAL9K3nVHXDtdonKPN4w8Arf0aYPv9njWEf53sX5qgz1EKmpw8a4m+72NVyji2kl0VT mTUClbRYVOEENC0RvrfsHugz5IiQSOblCcl6yqg8G7UUL8fXnm0TehQZCIV7d2n5OfWq 7UsmdUcjkqqS8QInWoiamC14p0wpZyaPIyl+g/QHjKqdLBJE6WP5msNLkQp2WEDlHx5G lfu5KMV1llWckW/b0LZKyZdX7kqX5814DbE28S1WBmVWA68ZY1vplXU7CLzqA12XPzGY nm3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VvZWvdq2hjhTiMiCs4bnFUE4kYUsQlszs3o6b8U4O0s=; b=UCeeIB4mfQsouR6nMNnTAE9+RIcxkqfnKpwyN2UfSjQnSf9oUqCA0lYNh8IEoV08lK Yr4btAdWgPNFyI7FOZRoKPKThPYdhDtmkOTCTrYiNI2Ey+YPyKzm0I2HHxDqeJMhqmQi j3nPLPesBKNZaRAhBehLEQxUz2AHqTJvL5IpuM/C6Lnmtv/wzjv+ozzKGdRG/IrB728U 9lnl1hqjRFvjPkHcz9T1jZltysb2izOV+0IUNKWUsvXLPE2oho1gRN5FXx4Z+yEAm/in i99cgKwndMEB6inrSx3pUP5LAFuIM4H5C7MuAo+rKylKfmsi65M/cdJmVg63YcAff6Ti Wi4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532es+7Ubz1SRHN186Q4NFCGco0lqOySWbiXPMe2kwdJPo+e6lOS OT8IyUT4uF39xSLv4nVed5TiXP/JVMheSSwJZNi4QOl+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyx+QNUM4NQUulAO3DQY5UTI1l/4GlaqCV74S7n8TL08VGLDIkHcOAgHf2Z7MvyEqaeoWEWcXtP7zE/BqwyEw=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ffc6:: with SMTP id h6mr14411083qvv.251.1597668845051; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJ4XoYcFbh8-nAxjxzzRgUahFfhcgcZQ2yMF2ewv_-DgUmhL=g@mail.gmail.com> <20200814164237.313071E971DB@ary.local> <CAJ4XoYeqj_5mpZu1PZP4rNfrWRyC5gC-2dfK7oX9xQHiR24QeA@mail.gmail.com> <085c6a5f-5451-ae8c-4873-133673ba1754@tana.it> <CAL0qLwaVUi9QtV4zcCwncuy4N3YPwsGZPzFfd1q19io79UG2VQ@mail.gmail.com> <c1844590-4b12-9763-21c5-6ac5b730321b@tana.it> <6358f3da-806b-f4eb-b9a0-8ee8ce4121d7@dcrocker.net> <4e549ca6-6047-6ff2-325c-fe8d7247e157@tana.it> <c972e0af-b589-1780-47b3-8cb2a2024ec2@dcrocker.net> <13a0ed72-2c5a-8ba6-84ab-b857e29403f1@tana.it> <b5935bde-e8-78ef-ed17-90a1d730aa9d@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <b5935bde-e8-78ef-ed17-90a1d730aa9d@taugh.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:53:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYc_DkPwcM+_4gkN1+nb60NGwVVNx2RFRtSZwEUY+GHDCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa632505ad1243c3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1pWjW7hx4rxJl1aGJqXlyqAmxKM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:54:07 -0000

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 2:17 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>
> No, it was just some political theatre.  We were already working on SPF
> and DKIM.
>

DKIM didn't exist  until that approximate time frame. There was Domain
Keys (DK) and there was Internet Identified Mail (IIM)

>
> > DMARC took that strategy to the extremes.  A number of users and
> operators
> > seem to have accepted it.  Why cannot we accept it too?
>
> Please review the previous bazillion messages on this topic.
>

Are those bazillion messages authenticated? ;-)

Michael Hammer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email