IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sat, 26 September 2020 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA0A3A0CDF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=GEyov1Np; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=doxjkjL+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jh04QdW27J9c for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB413A0CD8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8ACF80279 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1601160617; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=HhHReDxXbzZ6cBpPZQ8AhHqD4n51fwFn6DXm34cUW7A=; b=GEyov1NpiAtcSoW1/R2DbGjO6Nq9D0CnUyXHzn578Q+QBVKj5bOjVyAeEgJgnQDQCoI4X vGJB/sMR5nRksK4DQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1601160617; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=HhHReDxXbzZ6cBpPZQ8AhHqD4n51fwFn6DXm34cUW7A=; b=doxjkjL+IG5ikt4HQmsfuKGKeUpu6EP1xJJ3kBcIo/+qyusOnZiCB/Oli0kd3VcERwwRT /VRH0aLGWn7cJ8xMyt8x+S+FYgo+FfGZaK40Q5XxE69am/4IMV2Wt03sWMPlm8FkFq71Av8 vmB0jPDYrdj8BOkPno9BUOpCowtjBFy3rUPnGv2wBGujglajt3I0CFEw/JFG9E/T8ZWFH3B DXiYe6LCTUG1uACN8TCdJqpuZRP5bqzO+SHeC+MXpYqpI5pb9jb1ytZfEkAm+V6HTP7Zbr8 X9yeKDVIsU45kSImgtAL+CdgJDqIO+33KLmvpceOTFbTmCIThLqWg+lS1zWw==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED8F801A2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:50:17 -0400
Message-ID: <1761430.NcXDUDgPIN@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfOhHanZgdtdjU3e3kxwmM=aK7OYBWG2yTBO3GRPkC+JwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200815225306.967CC1E9E41D@ary.local> <aae4bedd72284a50b118c52a47517d72@bayviewphysicians.com> <CAOZAAfOhHanZgdtdjU3e3kxwmM=aK7OYBWG2yTBO3GRPkC+JwQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XT6qNwi3l2l5QJNzpd6aUnv_CeE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 22:50:21 -0000

On Saturday, September 26, 2020 3:56:44 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> Thank you, everyone, for backing off the personal attacks and apologizing.
> 
> Now let's get back to the technical merits of the open tickets, please--
> we'd like to close the current 3 out and open the next batch early next
> week.

Is the context in terms of the protocol specified by RFC 7489?

That may sound like a silly question, but I think fundamentally if "DMARC" is 
just an input to a filter or if "DMARC" is a protocol to reject/quarantine 
email that meets certain policy criteria makes a big difference in how some of 
these questions are addressed.

If I'm going to dive into details, I want to first make sure I understand the 
context.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email