IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 01 October 2020 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A7D3A08BB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOG_gy0R2jXi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77A9C3A02DC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 5so2739431pgf.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=1MkwBa5H2F87XkfqLPx9pZ/FDtFi21lnZIuq5pCeN8A=; b=AEsA5pNcOmH/l0/NncD7HI1QGWjgMeIimN5QhMroAqb2C2x7QeJcXaJbKTRPJm2Ydg nrW2MEkO9mUfTQZPGs7ZT8fLAjDf44cqWjnv8qvH63+H2T3390uybVHpywwcH77hl0eQ I2pIjqjKIUDhA7OC4ZaaXS2a2OvaVYjfkTd1IcLEdhvCRNdalkCGxbnL+Y4w0wPusWuu S7eJRtSRYMoR6efNaVbLyRG9/QUHQ4KI9jbJYqWuzlfEzfjg8TjDV5GLuFNU3S8i4qXe ch36urPe6DNbpW/yaKvwOOlMmLFBL0rO3VuJ/s3pht9+/lpry2l8iH0k9UvLXcBQNVRz 1POA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=1MkwBa5H2F87XkfqLPx9pZ/FDtFi21lnZIuq5pCeN8A=; b=QxAGyTlcvNaTK1a8AbFphwgL/kmWT1wT81mdLc9IgrZOshRVah5hpGQoNFd5P0IMfy qD/JzArmF1KzVdUxWZYiRK+vdOTpfoLH8vigMmYvJCYXOECTAsSogosQB1YTqNW42EZI 3ftwHqoByR3HCmgfdpae1P4l14qWU9zIGvrfIsVqRcG88aIpDbCVoKKh6Vd4xOTCHsTB 1W2JWRwwcEkHqmJ8wW/2id0QAR12QuQVdJKedKa7lIoTlMZ4/f7QUp4uGTRRN+3W30l9 /u6MM0ngfy+2k0kTHtnJAGSWgCOTYl6CySTCzqztpq8LwrYCjn5o73eJEDtHW1/YfIJV CQyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334ZLfuLZepW/eL7pb8bqBAeHXgpMtqd4avmLzwY7lo6q92l8KA WBnTfQ1LrlVaKa2aPwd8L75sitLRi1uADw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwB+Ehhc9rGSTJnIVcgBRjimPWTcLZjESOe0WMsYYQAY13cCGk2fbGESE+NBU4GSxbA00hGwg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8a96:b029:d2:8cdd:d8f5 with SMTP id p22-20020a1709028a96b02900d28cddd8f5mr5067227plo.69.1601519326866; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 31sm3367168pgs.59.2020.09.30.19.28.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: hsantos@isdg.net, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20200927171611.838B321D9BAD@ary.qy> <5069099.lO0Lvmlme3@zini-1880> <a4e016ba-673a-81f0-829b-b3b7adb6fcac@dcrocker.net> <5F73393D.4010805@isdg.net> <7afb25f6-c258-e92c-fdfe-10fe26ccecec@dcrocker.net> <5F73B80F.2000402@isdg.net> <cc227616-e257-17af-66a7-3c8d7db762c4@gmail.com> <5F753B16.8050409@isdg.net>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <527386fb-e0c9-97ae-3feb-47e41b8def6d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:28:43 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5F753B16.8050409@isdg.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E39ED462BB6F00DAB48B3540"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HiRpWggrEQyj8yljuJVf4tzYCzE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 02:28:49 -0000

On 9/30/2020 7:12 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
>> I've no idea what any of your note has to do with the DKIM protocol
>> specification.
>
> wow.


I'll stop now.  As far as I can tell, this really has nothing to do with 
the existing DKIM specification, nor really anything to do with DMARC.

Perhaps others on the list can find something to work with, here, but I 
give up.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email