IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Mon, 24 August 2020 06:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112F23A0A4F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isdg.net header.b=ETFH3c2P; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=beta.winserver.com header.b=tjsKhCi8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id er2LEal_wHGb for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.winserver.com (winserver.com [76.245.57.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2AEB3A0442 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=681; t=1598248813; atps=ietf.org; atpsh=sha1; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From: Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=bLlpDDRVq17baI3DuQggThoGIzE=; b=ETFH3c2PV3H9t4eSgopNLM4dm3WlUcO4Ga4ebRdfEgzhwCwfXaHF4M9DYsgv6j kYMuCsYjjuDUrftonnHtC4LOCoBSl9wV6XznKCU/TYYL1cyNHgidMPAQCggKWxs0 4mPJvl+KNW6YZKtaZBqxsTp7YJdAVWgEOAqlpL+Wp18hU=
Received: by mail.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v8.0.454.10) for dmarc@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 02:00:13 -0400
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; dmarc=pass policy=reject author.d=isdg.net signer.d=beta.winserver.com (atps signer);
Received: from beta.winserver.com ([76.245.57.74]) by mail.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v8.0.454.10) with ESMTP id 278938071.5.3892; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 02:00:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=681; t=1598248656; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=3+4Coch pwQkDt9nKj34gRkvfwGvwLSFL707VG9lMX0k=; b=tjsKhCi87pyjygj5A1xGh2e Nw7dDTNSsLp3qulQ18W6AJl66Aw4ZzQavECleBbeZuNt4UT/F9ke91cVlfXWsNeZ 4COI5ByQUV2CVT5+yosquCTIGEJEjtHipfqqUNjCc0r2p9NFBFOLmMFAC8fAxK9U nSjn3GyE7Pc9u3K8ShVc=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v8.0.454.10) for dmarc@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:57:36 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.68] ([75.26.216.248]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v8.0.454.10) with ESMTP id 145895187.4.212; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:57:35 -0400
Message-ID: <5F43576A.4050905@isdg.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 02:00:10 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Reply-To: hsantos@isdg.net
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20200815225306.967CC1E9E41D@ary.local> <c1679087-6c6e-7147-fea5-b4513f2c060c@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <c1679087-6c6e-7147-fea5-b4513f2c060c@bluepopcorn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9QGz36KPRA7BiAAouPHXVlDkUGA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 06:00:26 -0000

On 8/21/2020 3:09 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:

> On 8/15/20 3:53 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Assurances that are provided by ADSP are generally obtained out of band in the
>> real Internet, and not through ADSP.  Current deployment of ADSP is not
>> recommended.

> Is that not exactly the same situation with DMARC, except that the
> policy in question now is "reject" rather than "discardable"? Yes,
> it's just a keyword, but it reflects the semantics of the expected
> action as well.
>
> -Jim

No one was expected to follow a reject, so it was said, until it did 
happen.  SPF pushed

-- 
Hector Santos,
https://secure.santronics.com
https://twitter.com/hectorsantos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email