IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 28 September 2020 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117DE3A131A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-eUBaYgKZxz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAFF13A1319 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id c5so2142266ilk.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=De+PsECJqa0Nwo/pPGFybdH5+mvCB+EbVUSnhJ5R6KI=; b=VsDgXLjtG8VUBVKsXFs2n6BFAjBY2DDIqHu+sX2i+3hkylUa3thOumqRJFXCilNOBM l2xqYVjRoZwaL3vern35my0jrJC6hecyW0qDae8n1E285F8gM01RLYiSAv0obewcQvRZ ZtYLdKqBDhiYGRJ4XOWReAYdg5vSKVdQykeRg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=De+PsECJqa0Nwo/pPGFybdH5+mvCB+EbVUSnhJ5R6KI=; b=RvWZLVnDJj7ZjR92jpfbiISs7SZKloh4Sq/mY7CjPy0U+QQjlFFZ/TQWvwWsbOrldC MOloHPlqTAnVwKMWhCQv4PQx6pk3lR3+WmtMd/cnICruoXJKuCDMXQnf8Q21xifyjrwc 9d95GRSjI+NpW4Y2jC6D6Ywst4qr4oojaVBREM7h7WAEIJeUCUnL3634Duv9nT38OOfx euqTExJUOZNIRWzB8aC8XNpI+e1/A+Mg1GGXWU2Tcqm8ly7y9LPYUOElrgDgJdmMUNGw nzRtfFdbvmybZi+SVO6avUgcn51RHT0WXnd+D7Glz68PgFI253MWwwkIjOiv0PxMqeJX DLjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xAazwsT4r/yssUry9ohp4OHti1PR1PahgR6GAS6b2KW+n9dno lrjDRvywyWdKzoM9npL7Y5ueQ2saiClMYjV0fzL+zg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIreS1WxNaVNzpsi5hbmNCZxfpP4KXXC45tTEBKEYlEhcns9IGqkT+yX+6J6DcGK4Bf2koIh+XYx9PwnlG/f8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d7c3:: with SMTP id g3mr2159013ilq.120.1601315599635; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200927171611.838B321D9BAD@ary.qy> <5069099.lO0Lvmlme3@zini-1880> <CABuGu1oSshRN20twB6w1r6bnDDt8sunkPG9JY=V8Nme1Y5hVUg@mail.gmail.com> <8a46a7b1-ac28-9681-7752-749147522eb6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8a46a7b1-ac28-9681-7752-749147522eb6@gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:52:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pjy5LKUXuREGc1bj2ds-LuuGeFrTvAeL=Xe-mzPcW5bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007d6d6e05b06357b8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Z4QZQwPIJZaBoz84o39Z2gOYnVM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:53:22 -0000

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:46 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> . . .given that 'disposing of' the message is a domain owner goal,
> frequently, perhaps changing "disposed of" to "processed" would be less
> inviting of misunderstanding?
>

Yes, I think that, at least in American English usage, "disposal" tends to
have a bit of a pejorative connotation.  Consider that in the context of
people who have to deal with truckloads of UCE and other bulk email and the
negative association becomes even stronger.

+1 to adjusting the terminology to be less biased.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email