IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156373A09F8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=DlH7MEK1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=mVWkIGSz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gb3y_dkvS0VL for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D880B3A08EC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F96F80295 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1601074804; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=MP8ooafD9jM48/s6dRHWUO0ESa07klR7qEjHC3Mh6Mw=; b=DlH7MEK1XMPz6PdhLbf/RPGYHMXkv+B9Q+0ZbU8IEq1tg3agSijTa3xohlN0eD5i4dSAU 4Y70rKkRzP/SznYAA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1601074804; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=MP8ooafD9jM48/s6dRHWUO0ESa07klR7qEjHC3Mh6Mw=; b=mVWkIGSzxkWupasBH0xoK1XleWKGQsxTgCoo9A4Ea174+tLnHTk0HtCxoVLkQsQVSrt3z 5dS9RlbCwG+MAWqv4LDzD79Q625l0xUUfIYwYtouC3ZiSxCyMvBOuL6QkSnza9H5iB7NWlT cDNNzFx1ogQpJ4tj9D7UqjYvmSw/aZaAO/zG8N2I2MTFPq4L+D4z8fyefRH1B8BVijnvFpK MKKRU0UYsKrjs2RyEmuBOjnIc8kBJx7FiwWezl947xx4bXjhiWgK0hUL0tO2LOgDtfhg2JF Zy9cIE3huRceBlsAV9Xzzp8kC6zwuSykKJC679Wtgmwz3s9wvTbtwo0H7wXw==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF09F801A2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:00:04 -0400
Message-ID: <6089649.VB6F1bvo3X@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <63f00819-b798-c967-16a4-69bbb0881780@dcrocker.net>
References: <20200815225306.967CC1E9E41D@ary.local> <4004580.HQKp4RnRq6@zini-1880> <63f00819-b798-c967-16a4-69bbb0881780@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/r5gquUbwZ7Sm5IsccS_AqPPH7hM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 23:00:07 -0000

On Friday, September 25, 2020 5:25:38 PM EDT Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 9/25/2020 1:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >   If something like this is going to be
> > 
> > standardized, it shouldn't be called DMARC because it's not.
> 
> That was cryptic. Please elaborate on your concerns.

In my view the linkage between the identity in From to domains authenticated 
by DKIM and SPF (d= and mail from) is a fundamental property of DMARC.  If you 
change that, it's not DMARC anymore.

Clearer?

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email