IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Mon, 28 September 2020 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7DA3A10D4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=7EXvt25J; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=rfNju2q4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_6sd3DIxtwF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE453A1098 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCA1F80284 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:29:07 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1601296147; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=TC18URo106SkSvCMXHWP3zX3RM5UEgqQdpo47zyXfGA=; b=7EXvt25JuKHZbLLq7AEdWGYy0kKdgEXpqwX34DXgolGdS0SpsNMrH0ZSo/qF8dcSofP0M SHwyUB424G0ASSJBg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1601296147; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=TC18URo106SkSvCMXHWP3zX3RM5UEgqQdpo47zyXfGA=; b=rfNju2q446pmhvd9h8ww54X4o1d83tBKnzTx538SCFEVuXd/W3bGzjO+u1V3OsKqJTudw cM0XVlaG6f4D8nbLdiiSt15JimewUXkNSJYG5A423gPHppsekvTxByrcIS4M0KlM7VD4yG6 CYrZ+RxPGKpvNnzSRxWSi1zYecysp94uhNclTQnq/5NDGwCXFFJluXe/sBpOytFHXS7JraC z12QNagBirwZEvjTLf+zt7H1RM5GsmexaNKNmWvU1+X7DJHUKWyV/WV2PK6TKPX6IYLagA/ QnEHr4/fhEXCs/Lt+dqR6zjU+eqQxrg1vEqqwzAM+bU0YcFE3F2j1LGOSP4Q==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B72DF801D5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:29:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:29:06 -0400
Message-ID: <1857412.LoXV2f40kA@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <62377167-b5ab-cc10-acdf-45208bb2dfad@dcrocker.net>
References: <20200927171611.838B321D9BAD@ary.qy> <4499848.MezZmEGGVd@zini-1880> <62377167-b5ab-cc10-acdf-45208bb2dfad@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UK4mZP_60wBF1iBW2ckbdFdsicU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:29:10 -0000

On Sunday, September 27, 2020 11:58:40 PM EDT Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 9/27/2020 8:53 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > So we agree that you claim DMARC practice is in variance with what is
> > specified and we should base the update to the specification on the usage
> > you have claimed is popular?
> 
> Depends on the analysis of that behavior, but it's silly to ignore the
> behavior and pretend Step 6 is what will (always) be done.
> 
> Protocol specification revision efforts pay attention to established
> practice.

I haven't said anything about what we should do going forward.  I'm trying to 
establish where we are.

I never suggested it will always be done, so let's leave the straw men aside.

To clarify:

It's your suggestion that the established practice is not aligned to the 
current specification.  Specifically you believe that the policy action in step 
6 is used only rarely.

Is that correct?

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email