IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 01 October 2020 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8FE3A1053; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.113
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.113 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oL3nns4sEi9r; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CBD3A103D; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.62.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 091DZb6l009836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:35:37 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20200927171611.838B321D9BAD@ary.qy> <5069099.lO0Lvmlme3@zini-1880> <a4e016ba-673a-81f0-829b-b3b7adb6fcac@dcrocker.net> <5F73393D.4010805@isdg.net> <7afb25f6-c258-e92c-fdfe-10fe26ccecec@dcrocker.net> <5F73B80F.2000402@isdg.net> <cc227616-e257-17af-66a7-3c8d7db762c4@gmail.com> <5F753B16.8050409@isdg.net> <CAOZAAfP2EAk7p7uiU0zKnnoeRLHkGg61=8qoSADK4fF-C+s=9A@mail.gmail.com> <5F754780.5080503@isdg.net> <CAOZAAfMF+ySSHmci7DD=+SRk6Psbsm7=3bGEUy+80owzRmFMmw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <17070425-6853-8c9d-6e6c-debebec7219a@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 06:32:21 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfMF+ySSHmci7DD=+SRk6Psbsm7=3bGEUy+80owzRmFMmw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/aRoCzIMW-t6JoOJwXUO0bpsP8pI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 13:32:34 -0000

On 9/30/2020 9:37 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> Hector, the chairs hear your frustration, thank you for not escalating 
> further, and would be happy to speak with you off list on the matter.


Seth,

Please reread the post you responded to.  It is, in fact, an 
escalation.  The tone you've set with your response  fully undermines 
the necesary firm, direct, disciplinary action.

And yes, I intended this note to go to the list, since my private note 
to you apparently was not sufficient.

There is a long-standing pattern of behavior here.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email