Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/aRoCzIMW-t6JoOJwXUO0bpsP8pI/
2937615
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/AkbKOjIabuPHLVzr8f63YP1nC2s/
2937583
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draftRe: [dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft
Alessandro Vesely
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kuKAVu9p4z72KVWHoPEpWBQS5xo/
2937491
1915800
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Seth Blank
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8MUBcGD8BV29rky8SyyTSRo8nI0/
2937459
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IzNFdikZEdhUFlsdPTlN4_5I3Fs/
2937429
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Seth Blank
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/b6thcSkdp9VEy9q-qu63IvyVoX8/
2937424
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/HiRpWggrEQyj8yljuJVf4tzYCzE/
2937422
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SeM-IVQ1ZhkP1hT08lNIKiSSQtk/
2937416
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EfbfstXq99XFhP280DbsVmxdn2I/
2937176
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BXAVi_usR6L2d3Lw8tyDpv0V31U/
2937173
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wc3hc1bw7IlVYbnN50CUfnMyTJg/
2937172
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vlqWrBNNZ-gD8xYFUG7AX9Ix8AY/
2937163
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bZ5d1OiyYgenk-ZlqL1-JGf0vUU/
2937159
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicatorsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GK__FRraXS7x5dAZNx9ekqEF5_w/
2937129
1915764
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KzJ4VVtVUe4r9LnxOBX1CR-wjJ8/
2937116
1908582
[dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft[dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft
Douglas E. Foster
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3fJ62R-sr566AD_2VJIB7qdUSGE/
2937051
1915800
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LaJQ2ZxUOrHlMQgc1kSaPe7G8Uw/
2936964
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicatorsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/jbGuNIdZBaEgaWw5yE5tjlWYv18/
2936920
1915764
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/m0kYUum5u6fwkP6Ypo-M9Ltn5yI/
2936919
1908582
[dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators[dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GB_SNr55eNAjLgH5z2fo8i-e88c/
2936915
1915764
[dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override[dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OTI93bcRXxrIetHkFzmzFcJj13Q/
2936902
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/R3QTedVkORQC4B0n0pgEuad7fRo/
2936870
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/RcBn_eKq5I5bvvjXyY1_SA6y0zA/
2936867
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/b4Y75kHtSYRc7kZ8uqRB18M_tkE/
2936866
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JZ3RfuPBet5u5ENAsi7WHBM-A0k/
2936865
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZMtXd9Fv_mcWYJ9KHhkBqLOAA34/
2936861
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_O-X4sC3xJR3tqH-wKyrK1Qk9O4/
2936859
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/U477uMAgSuTzoa0CdJmjZ0kTMYw/
2936849
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: revisiting ticket 66Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: revisiting ticket 66
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/J3naWR1c6iZEfNZy_tiirfXTGUk/
2936848
1914909
[dmarc-ietf] I[dmarc-ietf] I
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ud-z8xpZMFNMk-ZzAZmi4Lrs_sE/
2936813
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3X--5h4finZxboLDmBLLjakeu8I/
2936747
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Alessandro Vesely
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/lp2Thvnp6iETxY7RvayaBUMD1u4/
2936746
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dotzero
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tdzapdyuxyscQtgAY2TZCMA5Gf0/
2936742
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/jpQVNYVWn_x60uE08SkB_4fjXc0/
2936736
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue submission - Mailing list security and potential solutions using DMARCRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue submission - Mailing list security and potential solutions using DMARC
Alessandro Vesely
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QXbe4bVFSskdVdYY25VfkvI3Cyc/
2936730
1913135
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fciMH478V0DhhH_4hDE8SEJbaM4/
2936641
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Dotzero
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/gxkBmJwMGskhidHqcRYVw6iiGPE/
2936628
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 38: reporting the proper DKIM key(s)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 38: reporting the proper DKIM key(s)
Alessandro Vesely
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/V8_tEXjHBI4dSolObD47u7cPoTE/
2936610
1898443
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Alessandro Vesely
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/feDYm9T_NVnyzh0swqTGEqa_9xw/
2936609
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Scott Kitterman
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LwFRfD0xizcTyHyVFVIcmFr97-Y/
2936548
1908582