IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Mon, 17 August 2020 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC0F3A0D89 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hm2hqLOLSLRk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3592F3A0DDA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1597686510; bh=FNs9SlZvVffxsuRTkO+NNgArOwea0agYTml3Rvtu1F4=; l=1016; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BBIvmVdo1jeLcJ6Neu77Hj8Yc9kfyuElRC72PjrwGQhiSwwHeZ+bNgjw+LmYiJl+2 N8wlVpVtnvBaYw7IW5qg8y1O0uPBUt2bHi9/CyS+1J/1dbHeUBiovlluHRxARG0ZvY DVZIwQ/xi81pMf1gipXPMrBCHyBD+VXOdfnuO/F6MR0LXUaBM/Ym9u25XasWC
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([5.170.69.62]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC053.000000005F3AC2ED.0000229E; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:48:29 +0200
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CAJ4XoYcFbh8-nAxjxzzRgUahFfhcgcZQ2yMF2ewv_-DgUmhL=g@mail.gmail.com> <20200814164237.313071E971DB@ary.local> <CAJ4XoYeqj_5mpZu1PZP4rNfrWRyC5gC-2dfK7oX9xQHiR24QeA@mail.gmail.com> <085c6a5f-5451-ae8c-4873-133673ba1754@tana.it> <CAL0qLwaVUi9QtV4zcCwncuy4N3YPwsGZPzFfd1q19io79UG2VQ@mail.gmail.com> <c1844590-4b12-9763-21c5-6ac5b730321b@tana.it> <6358f3da-806b-f4eb-b9a0-8ee8ce4121d7@dcrocker.net> <4e549ca6-6047-6ff2-325c-fe8d7247e157@tana.it> <c972e0af-b589-1780-47b3-8cb2a2024ec2@dcrocker.net> <13a0ed72-2c5a-8ba6-84ab-b857e29403f1@tana.it> <CAJ4XoYe3jWWRbP7_Jfp_my7iwVVObr7+Vuj9v_D_AVPuW+Yzyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <8eb896bd-9b97-df16-241f-64ce9ed7297e@tana.it>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:48:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYe3jWWRbP7_Jfp_my7iwVVObr7+Vuj9v_D_AVPuW+Yzyg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tG5ES2pIEs95uHMOfEAVZAbtlY4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:48:39 -0000

On Mon 17/Aug/2020 14:48:31 +0200 Dotzero wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 2:03 PM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>>
>> Gmail has a visual perspective that allows them to know each and every
>> email domain worldwide, and employs a number of people who help
>> continuously upgrading domain reputation.  In order to enjoy such
>> technology, medium-small domains can get a G Suite account.  That's
>> oligopoly.  If the technology were simpler and clearer, running one's
>> own mail server could be a valid alternative.
>>
> 
> Setting aside DMARC, running email servers has always had a bit of
> complexity that is beyond the ability of the average person. I'm not sure
> what your point here is.


Having very many autonomous MTAs is better than oligopoly, from a 
dynamic social stability point of view.  As spam elimination is the 
most prominent complexity that cause giving up private MTAs, global 
DMARC adoption might have the potential to stabilize communications.


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email