Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson@wisc.edu> Mon, 17 August 2020 22:52 UTC
Return-Path: <jesse.thompson@wisc.edu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FA73A13FB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wisc.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9IL-EKqYOJyA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmauth2.doit.wisc.edu (wmauth2.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B783A13F9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2173.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.173]) by smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190812 64bit (built Aug 12 2019)) with ESMTPS id <0QF8005EUCV5L810@smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for dmarc@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:52:18 -0500 (CDT)
X-Wisc-Env-From-B64: amVzc2UudGhvbXBzb25Ad2lzYy5lZHU=
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-2, Version=6.4.7.2805085, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2020.8.17.224218, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.75.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2020.7.21.5750001, SenderIP=[104.47.59.173]
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GyNQclH4edxotWSxxXouVPMQZh0pigocworpquIB0rN+0GmK5xL2ANR/MwdaJdnZ/XHfJd8yK+7p3P3pJs++h5ENZ+JlrDR4I0RPAQOMJzjMJKfF2JmFHhk5ovzSf+RYCKzzXSEIfS1vSGSr09Eg/YZJbRvLAdDgzeG7z71agstdNqUqjzYEpWFYKZ7H/kDFq9WrescwDHh3c2FP6vbyQheU9Sg17boGD0WpGVh0/xBX6W0ESkR4Y7lZV6xKCnDaC5r7POOx8Zn1DsTq31HseX04efCq9vwj133DVWzk2qlCnoHRv+c5W2gw/9A2i9+s8lkXXtjeCUkA1TEHhIHJ0g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7GeqTLMhT0Rds39311DarbkTOhPkzeKo9tBdKwkpdq0=; b=aM8huil/JJwBd4XU89U7mSlNhPp9Sw/dbH6ps41d6aVdzpaXxEyAAQ9w0JgVy2qmekCbzFkEzOr+lne98Idd7QvQrfiqSFUtY6FGHw9cMv56Y8XVg0rwmyPrJGgeL6ilzdQeqOLhp0oKrwh0PVhlInPpRjQ2V08VlB+rW4DS7QrrlpFHg8M6Q+MEOv7E2k4sAT9Vp54okkalyC03ZBwoS9vZIjgZSYBQCdc7NyzeMv9WvfEKPWIcqKenMBUhxajd6poO/HmxndeJvkxvMa0CugD8JKC2ou2583Td+XoFT7Nc1yLkbaqSVMmEZnOFCnWHwSwGhCN6BNacfPmQ5H88Lw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wisc.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=wisc.edu; dkim=pass header.d=wisc.edu; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wisc.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7GeqTLMhT0Rds39311DarbkTOhPkzeKo9tBdKwkpdq0=; b=gFp8xNwCb8QjDcMaXY6hrK/Z4Kar99mVUqQPUxONd+KMLmP00BuF61tf+Iia4GdaU943GdPJUTK7K/rejitLvbu72xa2zNGO7wp5eghvslzl0nfljUtrOeQE5K9eRxeABW+XomaUjnaGwhSNOzYCaZLYU/yLfbQZpSQOiFgNljs=
Received: from DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:7b::16) by DM5PR06MB2395.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:59::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3283.23; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:52:17 +0000
Received: from DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8def:be24:c82c:8d50]) by DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8def:be24:c82c:8d50%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3283.027; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:52:17 +0000
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20200807191216.43E971E4014E@ary.qy> <B5271A94-7B89-4226-BE77-471E698E1284@marmot-tech.com> <BY5PR13MB299920E15CC75E9D72F67170D7430@BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4fa0afc4-d3cd-994a-f02-f38da4cb1543@taugh.com>
From: Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson@wisc.edu>
Message-id: <7ce20245-5942-14f3-3220-1faaa2c8ccbb@wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:52:03 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/81.0a1
In-reply-to: <4fa0afc4-d3cd-994a-f02-f38da4cb1543@taugh.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: CH2PR20CA0020.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:58::30) To DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:7b::16)
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from [146.151.213.183] (146.151.213.183) by CH2PR20CA0020.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:58::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3283.15 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:52:16 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [146.151.213.183]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: e27a8794-83f7-4084-aef6-08d8430030b1
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM5PR06MB2395:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DM5PR06MB239555F54BEBF24EF06B373BF65F0@DM5PR06MB2395.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7691;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: z1ywZIvamRzThZf36Zrub3ISshYEq9kgXe4dYnZOUoc/wf1pbxPhvdAFPxF4VU6P86bdaRZMQ2tPBMa5CkJ6nSlr2vw95O0uoXLjUnjXqcpkuW6bLMOkHMXVdohtmjkDzf/3zsvXPG7nPP3lJWBs2A5P05OqGCYRAGgGiyrkFZ2zbjvAMUerwwT4y54MdDBG9ukYeQ16i7+jZhCzM2ZwhwAKwUsrTHRVPmxWFXkQ77tCWvY0Yi8pjqw5A2rIV/xvUOldoBFeEcf2NOVDUubLe8OpX3ZdfoqS9tmj94YuVhNjute/2sKbLSc+Y79hAeS5DSsw+HshmMZvF+QgUYogBNj52g1u63+Rd2SsBvcpCQjZjGKyURhEikiAemHok6/RNNy0TgjIG9+n8WSMLDNm/kQ6dgIn5Q5iCqLx9Vp6dW0wcdbjD1lirjIW6RK7658RflJ0w3Niejo/lGHnqmB3xT3WecylmWtgH5V8vaYcPpk=
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(66476007)(31686004)(8676002)(316002)(6706004)(83380400001)(16526019)(16576012)(31696002)(66556008)(86362001)(786003)(6916009)(6486002)(66946007)(36756003)(2616005)(956004)(75432002)(5660300002)(26005)(44832011)(6666004)(186003)(2906002)(53546011)(8936002)(478600001)(3940600001)(130980200001)(43740500002)(223123001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: wisc.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e27a8794-83f7-4084-aef6-08d8430030b1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Aug 2020 22:52:17.0696 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 2ca68321-0eda-4908-88b2-424a8cb4b0f9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: rkhTMDBrPgjsqIBN1Yot/SjmVHwl6ZNl2oP6SdqfaFehQh/KnDey2cpU+ZD9djC5lxZIXLq4rqMV56MyGYkkkw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR06MB2395
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-95Be_mh7maNxvbso1ez301X4Uc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:52:21 -0000
On 8/13/20 10:03 AM, John R Levine wrote: >> -Admittedly, that's where my bias comes in. My job is working with organizations that have paid my employer for me to be that outside help, so it's rare for me to see how badly it can be done by people setting restrictive DMARC policies without knowing what they're doing. > > If they all talked to you first, we'd be having a very different discussion. With a complex organization the only way to get people to change is to publish a restrictive DMARC policy and then see who comes out of the woodwork sheepishly admitting that they've been ignoring us for years. Normal people sending email (especially those who are working with an ESP, most of which happily send email without any DMARC alignment) do not comprehend the notion that they should be using a subdomain for their transactional messages; even when we directly communicate this fact to them repeatedly. They just don't understand the nuances of email. Similarly, it's only way to find all of the old DMARC-unaware MLMs, most of which haven't been security-patched for years. Forcing them to upgrade to a MLM that can munge the From is a back-door way to get them to patch, or reassess their commitment to running the list in the first place. Enterprise IT/cybersecurity actually want to get better manageability on the email their institution emit. Misdeploying DMARC provides that. Publishing restrictive DMARC on user domains is not always a clueless IT decision. Jesse
- [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differ… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Luis E. Muñoz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- [dmarc-ietf] LSAP - Lightweight Signer Authorizat… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Tõnu Tammer
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Tim Draegen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… Rolf E. Sonneveld