IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, was non-mailing list

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 14 August 2020 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B063A0BE3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net header.b=Xzd9bjAU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dmsR0yBQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UmJUQqF2ZVKs for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DFBF3A0B55 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930C4E28; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:44:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbiw.net; h= subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=C tnivnPB1wZEA4+0tNjcIY7aWMJUiJb6wzEoPT7aFwA=; b=Xzd9bjAUi4yzfT+rc +s7uB75P7KsRCSz8dmvjIqo+aEl77dCV8VIJQh59irU5KJhuTsnZ/d016eG8+Iad 4DiU2aBuXpyHyVn0ts9HeMYdt28S9MitEryOhMh5KU4cr3L0C1ShWx606ycNAXON fT5VoyS2neZO00A4fupog3TFCcMnwEfQ2OZY+Ml2M772VjU0gkUjHEF4LFF6KQSg lhwEVzGBOGFQguAVSKHOckNe+DZJk7/i7nbBEqd+T584WP/eHY8lIrxfKTKWhJxR ip0wXiTFXzzDkIMSdRTI9GmS0WoSL5JjW0Kg3azaD8zCOOJtjNZKeoJQpvtXHQ0w j8sPA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=CtnivnPB1wZEA4+0tNjcIY7aWMJUiJb6wzEoPT7aF wA=; b=dmsR0yBQYr8UD35RAjyJHkUime1S/hXT03vwcMBoYk27fUPaHk2vyh3VZ mSmLqzxJTqdy4zm2vpksN0Fh85wJ0TTrrf9XlSvXgVRJoxyg05mYaIgj2esWZYt0 RATnYNsfsFDGApFH/wIavd3PMtXIhHe7Mk6fA2IO557mnvSMd7f9erUf49de30Il gL5+zX8LNqrLwraVcJcNGpgjysNoHpr9eNUtZdaeKAaeGxUf1kLepltzeKa+x1wN 50IUV/ulfhjtVSSRKngxCQc8ecQjkc+L0MqTxHgf53LdCXIldjqinrVxdilcW8mT 64/+kB/sZWP05iDFZ5xer/xfnwEhQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iew1X1w62NVbQtRTkOzlmhq89amDJb1m6TeMknrwYYYACiXVN1ooiA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrleeigdeglecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefuvfhfhfhokffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgv ucevrhhotghkvghruceouggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptddvfedugeehjefgvdffffelleegudfftedvueejkeeuveeiledufefhgfev hfejnecuffhomhgrihhnpegssghifidrnhgvthenucfkphepuddtkedrvddviedrudeivd drieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep uggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iew1X1SdRS4T_eovZtXE2XmNcSUJ0Pobt1YWHKRgnMIGHWQFG-TwhA> <xmx:iew1X_XMzReVvUavHxffqphmpU86qHWbSLg8kcbaDgQ-kiUGVdHYKQ> <xmx:iew1X3jOg7VsHNqW5W0ruCkmq4hkuoKAP-o9iNJXva65e0nNyy06EA> <xmx:iew1X6MUu_wxRpLzltqZwtvt4XwPYGKI63iHyqigjgnB4Yq-5Z030Q>
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AD6BC3280060; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:44:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20200810172411.A13681E7CD8B@ary.local> <7e9326fc-ae27-d4bd-9f2b-9896da8320f1@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwacyBbJscEM_a4-nvugO0HBaSAdPqUPkfYYOOb++cOjQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <2e5408af-c3c1-1b34-4600-70a355ef0eb5@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:44:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwacyBbJscEM_a4-nvugO0HBaSAdPqUPkfYYOOb++cOjQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/b1XdQz8dFNwv2Irh-LYzgnhzyTc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, was non-mailing list
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 01:44:46 -0000

On 8/13/2020 5:21 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I'm disappointed that the experiment never really got its day in court, 
> but the consensus is clear.  +1.

30 years ago, there was a generally adventurous tone in the community. 
Things are a lot more cautious now.

I remember back then hearing various ideas or proposals and for many of 
them thinking "I've no idea whether that will be useful or successful 
but it sounds like something worth trying."  Not so much these days.  Alas.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email