Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains

[Hector Santos <[e-mail]>]

On 7/30/2020 7:57 AM, Ken O'Driscoll wrote:
> On 30/07/2020 11:39, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> That works at a domain-controlled level.  But people sign up for,
>> and write to, mailinglists on an individual level.  Mismatch.
>
> To be fair, this thread is specifically about a non-MLM use case at an
> organisational level. But, I believe that any improvements to how DMARC
> might handle use cases like mailing lists will likely have to be at the
> domain-controlled level for there to be any chance of widespread adoption.
>
> From experience, the type of organisations that are deploying DMARC (in
> p=reject) are not interested in allowing individual senders to delegate
> which third-parties can send on their behalf. Banks etc. don't care
> about mailing lists, most have HR policies that prevent employees from
> interacting on external discussion groups so it's not on the radar.
> However,  the use case presented in this thread - executive assistants
> sending on behalf of multiple DMARC protected brand domains - is not
> that uncommon and I think a policy solution to that would be warmly
> welcomed.

+1

-- 
Hector Santos,
https://secure.santronics.com
https://twitter.com/hectorsantos