Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 02 August 2020 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203843A0C59 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rgarf2Oiascr for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE25A3A0C57 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id n25so4609790vsq.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FGFerMg38rHBW7mCwOsS/WSYuYwuQCqFXBnnTddewd4=; b=F5IWikCfVqYvKWCfTprkrXgo5BhlznvOLtzOkrgpDxxSiTb2c34MX6r57cAGv0OPNm 9VvH2wlNFpkrtUFDKaHUom4EH/HnpFN1MbHOQl4pbOzM6trFlIXQB0+ildrJ9WAx3Ru2 Cpbqy06QxUPE6Xp6WwLuOfC8bY6jKiIh1VIDoSOZm96aA+axHPjxHeX73kpUkTNzn38t 7Wc75+PRIlJpLxiAXEeXx83VATcuL1CZh/6f3ivrERQRHKDNkd0r4ZrhprD1TRxzUgsu gcUX3S6V4NLARdZ41f0rzUQf98eLafeQ6F+/o5XXjqf0YXqK27qefrDuLnHHU/4qHpd4 k/Zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FGFerMg38rHBW7mCwOsS/WSYuYwuQCqFXBnnTddewd4=; b=Qlny6oSaiDsACGIUc6XqhY4nuSwPs7+FFrfNMm9a86GXUeUDODAGx09YBuoPodO3tT AFx9aIQUH7Qz90AeYDqQ/vi62g8W67jQOtyJqGQLLRJR68o3Bq7gPW0uVU2fTj9YL9j3 su+1LcYAgKGSINIFujQ30Qry3aMouPzu4hMzxseEVHSCfF2M+mkfpB1hM3TzItikCx0m o1xEadK4F1JrkJIfTg+IFzwNn2xqFBEg4qpo8t93Cx1W4czGuTtBI+b+4azK+SGC5Six iJqDq+mG2QuOq5dSmUnZBGNaLE7hDiZKpoNJP5LJnswSKEHo5xgW53skIWnRGO2bufOP SciA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NvfXHoGzEroejZAIV5GDczR7f8AQAlF9cpg9oUjYwszK//i64 3ijPW7Qjv33DrsghoDxAI8eQkeAcHjoMEDGUhAO0/Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6NDQ10QlKZK+B6kIMUvc0NOkquAel44QWmfYUh2LNJqyOLinL/VpkD1BiM0giZpDkQOXFgPnGYBwEYyS2mF0=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ed8c:: with SMTP id d12mr9694615vsp.8.1596403367778; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200802165756.3892C1DC82FD@ary.qy> <719dce3edbc54b25b6ebf248170e7eb2@bayviewphysicians.com>
In-Reply-To: <719dce3edbc54b25b6ebf248170e7eb2@bayviewphysicians.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:22:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYFoGHL13tLOnbgf97qtgLFDo4AmutZdQvMVsuX56Vz0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Foster <fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a79cd205abeb9f97"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/4k_bd4H9rWqmPLbZUsTX1oFcqhI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 21:22:50 -0000

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Douglas E. Foster <
fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com> wrote:

> If they would provide a way to register a mailing list and the servers
> from which it comes, and allow DMARC exceptions for traffic from those
> registered lists, your situation would be much easier?
>

Ignoring for the moment the problems of scale with any "register your
lists" solution, I don't think users can reasonably be expected to keep
such a registration current if, say, the servers were to move.  Such a
migration would no longer be transparent, as it is today.

-MSK