Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 02 August 2020 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214EF3A0C5E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=GMoa+nR2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=vZh97gVR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SuYnR_4Eld45 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB983A0C5B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 54189 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2020 21:24:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=d3ab.5f272f18.k2008; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=atvtPNXmngl8htrjerUYDBjBi8j4unPA3MruTDGCPx4=; b=GMoa+nR23KBaVaucPHv7FnU+rJGEbDHXP4v4CXh/98Kk7DC32cWrLjQeMTlQAkNBrhSUVHzxQkCx3IHScASsTIwMcsiY2UYfKkJZncgxvgevVm9ipBfYnjxhlrQov0Qgq3HO8cn6o/hEgCm4jx8bPc4vGQVsVG+GDAMAjZ/e14ww1EjpHoVz2U2LGj0nYasVDoAGeildPFVdHiUhQs62iIuZ5aJGLGqJ6dyQR3fAv+h8MkDVJfLGHuz+4TUVhGPLk/uvgSlUCRwykqZNZ5vv2B4DrfRhDra/gm5zK58mLQOMgyCtyVr5W0t28zqHtM0AQlw6wXJweJE8w4MnFG2ZDQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=d3ab.5f272f18.k2008; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=atvtPNXmngl8htrjerUYDBjBi8j4unPA3MruTDGCPx4=; b=vZh97gVRyKXtXAVMgsWqK/d+Ko/2hwB9KAy0PxE/9ay7dIgnNCnN+P0NMWIfl1uXE5w7iRXS1fLmpSzCYRT5TImtOczUnEAiDRUIQHLln+lPHfA8TZbcs+M1SVtvXVkj1SjCr+UohDyaRiZrZfPkbpduIuhSQmO32QXxd+sZPEkAYiSJauM3uVx2+DST8qznuvr5vqRN5MbiSSRGtqXByjzfgG/BiGCXsWZaojHqdVgATCbKyKerWcWtcsT4N8QlnVZpnzGQvYwtLVqn8vMlY3Srl7+NTVukjSUK/JaJHHwwu+IwrxnHsVib9v4i5PnVHxauU3pniFJiVg3aCGlr3g==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 02 Aug 2020 21:24:40 -0000
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 17:24:39 -0400
Message-ID: <f9967c0-1f1d-217f-7d6-a8ee1321e68@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYFoGHL13tLOnbgf97qtgLFDo4AmutZdQvMVsuX56Vz0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200802165756.3892C1DC82FD@ary.qy> <719dce3edbc54b25b6ebf248170e7eb2@bayviewphysicians.com> <CAL0qLwYFoGHL13tLOnbgf97qtgLFDo4AmutZdQvMVsuX56Vz0Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TebWZUdEOQAC27fwdPjup5IYxfE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 21:24:43 -0000

>> If they would provide a way to register a mailing list and the servers
>> from which it comes, and allow DMARC exceptions for traffic from those
>> registered lists, your situation would be much easier?

If large mail providers were willing to whitelist known mailing lists we 
wouldn't need ARC.

See previous messages for why that isn't sufficient.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly