IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5006B11E820F for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TGpQ3ywmIYHa for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE2A11E8178 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fe28e000000d82-4c-5266c310b5b3
Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 55.28.03458.013C6625; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:25:19 -0400
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
Thread-Index: AQHOyP5oVr5g0tNG40qkZHIVfdkr7poBFSgA
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:25:18 +0000
Message-ID: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C0EF250@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPiK7A4bQgg12bzC2apwhYzOz5x+jA 5LFkyU8mj5nHv7AEMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZWzZ8YK9YCpXxZI9rawNjG0cXYycHBICJhI7 b25khrDFJC7cW8/WxcjFISRwlFHi+YH7rBDOckaJ12+6WUCq2ASsJDp697CD2CICPhK7z05l ArGFBYwlXvx+wAYRN5GYemwqVI2RxKMrGxm7GDk4WARUJY5NTgQxeQV8JR489AapEBIwlHjR vgKskxOo+v/+BWATGYHu+X5qDZjNLCAucevJfCaIOwUkluw5D3WzqMTLx/9YIWxlie9zHrFA 1OtILNj9iQ3C1pZYtvA1WD2vgKDEyZlPWCYwis5CMnYWkpZZSFpmIWlZwMiyipGjtDi1LDfd yHATIzASjkmwOe5gXPDJ8hCjNAeLkjjvl7fOQUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoY 69KORXk8umWQ9bW5IihnrptmTsRxP3uujA8LbbU+bn+qpLlLZYPojOdvG08H2JyUS7q1K7vM RL6wKdxjX9zy8uudlxyldguJBzt+//+WMdzBzIjb97D6jOOHb/tOXdW7UCeVPZkx26C/2dZy y9anZ5ecygq0PKDwU2uNSICe7/u0LdsP3P6txFKckWioxVxUnAgAynjRRFICAAA=
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:25:31 -0000

Since the 6lowpan WG is shutting down, I support the idea of moving the bt-le document to 6lo WG.

-Samita

-----Original Message-----
From: 6lo-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:57 AM
To: 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

All,
     Now that 6lo is an official WG, Ted and I would like to move forward on closing the 6lowpan WG.  However, there is a draft
(draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle) that originated in 6lowpan, but has not been published yet.  It currently sits in IESG Evaluation awaiting feedback from the Bluetooth SIG.

     I would like to ask the 6lo group if anyone would have an objection to me assigning draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG.  There are two potential directions such an adoption could take.  The first is that there are no issues with the draft as it relates to the Bluetooth SIG and no work would be needed on the draft.  The other is that issues arise and the IESG needs to send the draft back to the WG for fixes/revisions.

     Can WG participants please respond negatively or positively to the reassignment of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG?  I will take feedback until Oct. 28th, 2013.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email