IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 15 October 2013 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B458721F9C05 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhEu+kTYl8vv for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-x22c.google.com (mail-qe0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C35C21F9C12 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 6so5880187qeb.31 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vScrYonwKxG5g2APoYwkG5/4AsV4AIT+waLQEs+j4mQ=; b=CytpAu595+EHTdNdPCuu/Th3ntgl4kKnWev0rhJEUjzmHwmpZLtCVqPkj1WAZq1ZPq ZFtCJZuBXI787jnZe7wkiV7uVatiSdWNhxcK6GF4xOXGDhjC36kxYMoTr2p/yNspUbem U1sStfSg6KT9XRzfpkvSXWm8gFP/V4A6QzIFUrBI4KT6zxme25Y9WdDxsZBmbzrihhU5 6ZWeo5wE0grw6fUxaeDZkO1fT4bcGfcEzLtPouSZ1dxc7KN5LymFerNVDM4nxEjzCJxC 6EZ7ljdEVCBL0l2EfF+y9RNdOBtyF7v76ESoKV38TK07TO2hKLHYZg6zsJ+sPdQOEbZh ahfQ==
X-Received: by 10.49.12.14 with SMTP id u14mr31466148qeb.74.1381809476009; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-1-125.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id og1sm106941886qeb.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:57:51 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D9D6D080-2D30-4B37-8B0F-DC76CB539973@gmail.com>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 03:58:10 -0000

On Oct 14, 2013, at 9:56 AM 10/14/13, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

> All,
>     Now that 6lo is an official WG, Ted and I would like to move
> forward on closing the 6lowpan WG.  However, there is a draft
> (draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle) that originated in 6lowpan, but has not been
> published yet.  It currently sits in IESG Evaluation awaiting feedback
> from the Bluetooth SIG.
> 
>     I would like to ask the 6lo group if anyone would have an objection
> to me assigning draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG.  There are two
> potential directions such an adoption could take.  The first is that
> there are no issues with the draft as it relates to the Bluetooth SIG
> and no work would be needed on the draft.  The other is that issues
> arise and the IESG needs to send the draft back to the WG for
> fixes/revisions.
> 
>     Can WG participants please respond negatively or positively to the
> reassignment of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG?  I will take
> feedback until Oct. 28th, 2013.

I think assigning future responsibility for draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG is a good idea and I support that action.

- Ralph

> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email