IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> Mon, 14 October 2013 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF8221E809F for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXuOe-NUkC+l for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC9F21E819E for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t61so7461344wes.34 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gPkeNVf31n7QoNhsFOBRjQLaSbJiNHYH65eni5VH/KA=; b=ECMGB8SIJAEZTFq9zfDghwLMGa0mggfRsZNHYhMKZSWmSsCIMCwgYuMeOawXJdXd5F IOMgnOhOq/Fox85pDosuEpBEm1vDGQUL9Gb0XrXh/8W9MH66ObvqOzNl4j015xn0BDcL H94Z8fYBnycqExbm+2OrRhHG6wcDA5rdAFBpKMa2QehxHfbWh6jtnU7G6FDeiEYBPUt4 AbAjnekv6jIIjGbR7ijPhRb9O8SHRGJ6B90Pq6wLR4YOxmyRPnhMXfgicCqEFIS+H5Em O//gGkAdWBMukVW2LgcFNbAnP7ti56Xk1qW2VvIfhemThcgwpICEoEjxlssOEk2pR4CO b0/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.198.77 with SMTP id ja13mr15377228wic.34.1381771623803; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kerlyn2001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.227.132 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <525C27C2.5070900@innovationslab.net>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net> <CABOxzu1TgLmuggFNgSFx4G20KOS5kCGVNMJbbv17EhSo_hdfyQ@mail.gmail.com> <525C27C2.5070900@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:27:03 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: BlDMThVpx8FfkI960TihFC5DtCI
Message-ID: <CABOxzu01pricRVFydES-cX+N_A3Fq=65BKA8vgSxVKw7PbPy1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b604a68cc325404e8b6c678"
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:27:20 -0000

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>wrote:

> Hi Kerry,
>
> On 10/14/13 1:05 PM, Kerry Lynn wrote:
> >
> > There is a draft in 6man, draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01, that is in a similar
> > state: awaiting standards action by the BACnet Committee of ASHRAE
> > (in progress).  Would you mind issuing a poll to see if we can get that
> > draft moved to 6lo as well?
> >
>
> I am curious as to your rationale for wanting to move the 6lobac draft
> now.  In the case of the btle draft there is a desire to close a WG, but
> there is no such need with 6man.
>
> That being said, there will be a discussion in Vancouver over drafts
> (the 6lobac one included) that could/should be moved to 6lo.  That is
> highlighted in the draft version of the milestones that have been posted
> to the mailing list.
>
> I was unaware that such a discussion would take place.  I agree it would
be better to handle draft-ietf-6man-6lobac in that more general context.

-K-


> Regards,
> Brian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email