Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Brian Haberman
<brian@innovationslab.net>wrote:

> All,
>      Now that 6lo is an official WG, Ted and I would like to move
> forward on closing the 6lowpan WG.  However, there is a draft
> (draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle) that originated in 6lowpan, but has not been
> published yet.  It currently sits in IESG Evaluation awaiting feedback
> from the Bluetooth SIG.
>
>      I would like to ask the 6lo group if anyone would have an objection
> to me assigning draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG.  There are two
> potential directions such an adoption could take.  The first is that
> there are no issues with the draft as it relates to the Bluetooth SIG
> and no work would be needed on the draft.  The other is that issues
> arise and the IESG needs to send the draft back to the WG for
> fixes/revisions.
>
>      Can WG participants please respond negatively or positively to the
> reassignment of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG?  I will take
> feedback until Oct. 28th, 2013.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> Hi Brian,

I agree this draft should move to 6lo.

There is a draft in 6man, draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01, that is in a similar
state: awaiting standards action by the BACnet Committee of ASHRAE
(in progress).  Would you mind issuing a poll to see if we can get that
draft moved to 6lo as well?

Thanks, -K-

>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>