IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Tue, 15 October 2013 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF39621F9CCC for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yx5NwaDL01pE for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22f.google.com (mail-vb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C32511E8140 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h10so5192924vbh.20 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5njkZNs2VWUHUkeHcIUrZlUO6rTM1ytacssGtfY+IMY=; b=AUA6lK6RSkWpm/hr5bQCAN/QXs858kN+rNlt1pNunNMZBkQm3QyWPvzrknIxjpMJVf 9Ll0Ojw2TetnR+kglgPWw3SAnYlg98l994+MMC+/eU407M/aoRVD8xDZ/4lAQRKdIQGb 90NzPo1EdMnfs2Qa23+KpZ6Cy2YDZYh7l1lS8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5njkZNs2VWUHUkeHcIUrZlUO6rTM1ytacssGtfY+IMY=; b=ERE8BpaKcjVxoHsf7AAe9McKUTxvCn72l3g7nZHRP1RDY3KEjXbirJP6BdgYPgRF01 dye2cECcnIXFckmeLEKG+zXjCpmEaoqAIYNGO49NcECoWbc6tCDbBl255IPU6gy6epfb aIFj0Abg67DHQYDZkZNiTsOnKfS/DX8qnriCJEAnUNx2NP7Peehej6RKuV7743nNo9ud UuybZtvu3GDIJc5vjnc3QrS6iZusL6g5at1hJud/hwUtOWtYvrk4MoWJRMFC+iclv0rF ZOk5gVdk5pGwYs3gsb0qR3emnPEPkhWK1Lq6CUqoBj0BjzXnMKdRpBiP4h9bRli8JSbn IJOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHk/yq4wtokHhhU8nye0jI+Ve/JneWXGDmnoBz8SLU0G6V7e1BCG04TK3fObmnji2xQxIh
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.157.232 with SMTP id wp8mr33972068vdb.4.1381853595996; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.253.68 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <525D4D4C.5010703@ericsson.com>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net> <525D4D4C.5010703@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC-jkqKYq0ne0Qf+Jk9aUfWtMAVsHZHTrgLz=paU-xZ7+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:13:17 -0000

Hi Suresh,

one option would be to show also draft-ietf-6lowpan-* drafts on the
6lo WG page (thanks Carsten for that thought!). We have confirmed with
the webmaster that this is easily doable.

I'd suggest to wait until October 28, which is the final date that
Brian proposed for getting comments about asignment of
draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to 6lo.

Best regards
Ulrich

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Suresh Krishnan
<suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 10/14/2013 12:56 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> Can WG participants please respond negatively or positively to the
>> reassignment of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG?  I will
>> take feedback until Oct. 28th, 2013.
>
> I think it is the right thing to do. I am supportive of this
> reassignment. I would prefer that the draft be renamed though, as the
> tools will look for the wg moniker in the draft name in order for it
> to show up under
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lo/
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email