IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79FE11E81F9 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1sZHxUP02+w for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07BC11E820B for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fe28e000000d82-c2-5266c4e15c8f
Received: from EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.78]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 3E.A8.03458.1E4C6625; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:33:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:33:04 -0400
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
To: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
Thread-Index: AQHOyQK0Vr5g0tNG40qkZHIVfdkr7poBFjwA
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:33:04 +0000
Message-ID: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C0F0276@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net> <CABOxzu1TgLmuggFNgSFx4G20KOS5kCGVNMJbbv17EhSo_hdfyQ@mail.gmail.com> <525C27C2.5070900@innovationslab.net> <CABOxzu01pricRVFydES-cX+N_A3Fq=65BKA8vgSxVKw7PbPy1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu01pricRVFydES-cX+N_A3Fq=65BKA8vgSxVKw7PbPy1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C0F0276eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPn+7DI2lBBktOqlk0TxGwmNnzj9Hi 8vpVzA7MHk8nHGTyWLLkJ5PHzONfWAKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyms+/YClYq1nxszOugfGu ShcjJ4eEgInEvJlrWSFsMYkL99azdTFycQgJHGWU2HvrAiOEs5xRYv2MfhaQKjYBK4mO3j3s ILaIgLfEiyNXGEFsZgFFiVtzethAbGEBY4kXvx+wQdSYSEw9NhWongPINpJY9VwBJMwioCrR f+kv2GJeAV+JY3Ong9lCAs8ZJR41e4DYnAKBEsuO/2MGsRmBjvt+ag0TxCpxiVtP5jNBHC0g sWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/UM8oS3yf84gFoj5f4vTsF8wQuwQlTs58wjKBUXQWklGzkJTNQlIGEdeR WLD7ExuErS2xbOFrZhj7zIHHTMjiCxjZVzFylBanluWmGxluYgRG2TEJNscdjAs+WR5ilOZg URLn/fLWOUhIID2xJDU7NbUgtSi+qDQntfgQIxMHp1QDo3m+Dt/Fg44ZfCqi0nuCVSc4Pnig ciOg/c/txTH7b1k8PGa47seyxe3BEyet7nsjIcX1KdTt82Kl2U1lweFa9m9UAwzm6q9Y/oXh YelhxVdp95WuxHxpYHO1Oz0zII6pbPrnNyq1jHtcSqNMtYu2y2+YeLU756yCd1YHx5zucwXG tqWtf/+7KrEUZyQaajEXFScCAIGJQJCAAgAA
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:33:12 -0000

Hi Kerry,


That being said, there will be a discussion in Vancouver over drafts
(the 6lobac one included) that could/should be moved to 6lo.  That is
highlighted in the draft version of the milestones that have been posted
to the mailing list.
I was unaware that such a discussion would take place.  I agree it would
be better to handle draft-ietf-6man-6lobac in that more general context.
-K-


[SC>] Just to clarify the point:
           In Vancouver 6lo meeting, we plan to have a discussion on milestones where we can decide whether 6lobac should be handled in 6lo or should stay in 6man.

Thanks,
-Samita

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email