IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 14 October 2013 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFC221E8187 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGKIhXTsPwAR for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC56A21E8179 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45769880FA; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 102520116.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E738013680E4; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <525C27C2.5070900@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:20:02 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net> <CABOxzu1TgLmuggFNgSFx4G20KOS5kCGVNMJbbv17EhSo_hdfyQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu1TgLmuggFNgSFx4G20KOS5kCGVNMJbbv17EhSo_hdfyQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nce0nEcjpVCLmuiKdiPp6H9J5t6xgx8Sd"
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:20:11 -0000

Hi Kerry,

On 10/14/13 1:05 PM, Kerry Lynn wrote:
> 
> There is a draft in 6man, draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01, that is in a similar
> state: awaiting standards action by the BACnet Committee of ASHRAE
> (in progress).  Would you mind issuing a poll to see if we can get that
> draft moved to 6lo as well?
> 

I am curious as to your rationale for wanting to move the 6lobac draft
now.  In the case of the btle draft there is a desire to close a WG, but
there is no such need with 6man.

That being said, there will be a discussion in Vancouver over drafts
(the 6lobac one included) that could/should be moved to 6lo.  That is
highlighted in the draft version of the milestones that have been posted
to the mailing list.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email