IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 14 October 2013 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10A021E80E1 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc0xHTLo8uba for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6956221F968B for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E86880FB for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 102520116.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56A613680E2 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:56:51 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FdXsUQ0u72QDFavVCPgNI4vE1xEowhINc"
Subject: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:56:59 -0000

All,
     Now that 6lo is an official WG, Ted and I would like to move
forward on closing the 6lowpan WG.  However, there is a draft
(draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle) that originated in 6lowpan, but has not been
published yet.  It currently sits in IESG Evaluation awaiting feedback
from the Bluetooth SIG.

     I would like to ask the 6lo group if anyone would have an objection
to me assigning draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG.  There are two
potential directions such an adoption could take.  The first is that
there are no issues with the draft as it relates to the Bluetooth SIG
and no work would be needed on the draft.  The other is that issues
arise and the IESG needs to send the draft back to the WG for
fixes/revisions.

     Can WG participants please respond negatively or positively to the
reassignment of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG?  I will take
feedback until Oct. 28th, 2013.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email