IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Mon, 14 October 2013 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF1021E80F5 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMkxeu+uafjq for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x231.google.com (mail-ve0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F2D21E80B3 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cz12so118924veb.22 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wi9RKuKC1gvoLA4Tvj5UyhDC6P+CqtCJqBzj77UBlDM=; b=Jdlk5lODjiwPWi9lw9VoFPjjpeacOXTKoLKd5xZDjppsykfve2jqv4AJnVeWGxia4Q 2ZwJIw8Ft/xOXZCAuvXORIeiL3/66T66hkNYFhCmGSqlU+MyUT6dVA5GcEPHG4b5FjmJ tYMBeAaZ66VQYQPR7hMOfpueNYgMVyla3QT9o=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wi9RKuKC1gvoLA4Tvj5UyhDC6P+CqtCJqBzj77UBlDM=; b=jjGZeRTfjiu2N7JT7F1orYXtbAV0ibSmJZpOGY8Xi6gXvRGadu2e1Nj3em/G3b7SPq z8/i3LBIyhnMEEhkCccPTrqlHFbGv3dUB7ZSoDVRXQfUB9pXeu5EuIw/dV4E+dv1Kfk8 qrDOeUxTA0pIXPNcerR+hyhQr2NfsNTiMwXiXKnU2Vy0qYNquEph7IB/GSEPL/p+OV7e +N3n40TYCKrMJ/GYi4aTPRsBm4Qd2AfbS/V7xBzFiUSNy5f5NFqJuVsePCEhW3Mjpb0J kopCPvPeGy6VvpSZJ2GHrr9CMrJ6acCFVHN7nQ9S3UCXTl8WSCS97YEfNvfVcMTWbQga 4s/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmj5ZW/jn365ddlRK3Ser8zU2OdqN5lnhTEnxZKJ7wJWUl0g6P2F/goEreJjh5GJNdBgdm1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.35.136 with SMTP id h8mr29372235vdj.6.1381775921132; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.253.68 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962048AD7A5@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <525C2253.8080300@innovationslab.net> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962048AD7A5@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:38:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC-_9sR9HFsK0mV42M1Fs-udjxAD189ZHmAWYG12B5paAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: teemu.savolainen@nokia.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:38:43 -0000

Hi,

I am in favor of assigning the draft to 6lo.

Best regards
Ulrich

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM,  <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian, 6lo,
>
> As 6lo participant, but more so as one of the authors of the draft in question, I'm fine for reassigning the draft to 6lo. I can post draft-ietf-6lo-btle-00 as soon as you ask.
>
> I would also like to communicate to this WG that we have multiple active authors on the draft, and hence this work item would come with editors attached:-D
>
> I am (and have been) actually working on this topic in BT SIG, and I believe it is highly likely that we need to touch the draft a bit more than just add the L2CAP channel identifier that IETF requested from BT SIG. However, the changes should be quite straightforward. After the BT SIG has advanced and needed changes are known, a decision needs to be made whether the document should drop back to WG(LC) or not. For now the IETF side of the actual work needs to stay in holding pattern waiting for BT SIG.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Teemu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lo-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Brian Haberman
> Sent: 14. lokakuuta 2013 19.57
> To: 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: [6lo] Adopting draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle
>
> All,
>      Now that 6lo is an official WG, Ted and I would like to move forward on closing the 6lowpan WG.  However, there is a draft
> (draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle) that originated in 6lowpan, but has not been published yet.  It currently sits in IESG Evaluation awaiting feedback from the Bluetooth SIG.
>
>      I would like to ask the 6lo group if anyone would have an objection to me assigning draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG.  There are two potential directions such an adoption could take.  The first is that there are no issues with the draft as it relates to the Bluetooth SIG and no work would be needed on the draft.  The other is that issues arise and the IESG needs to send the draft back to the WG for fixes/revisions.
>
>      Can WG participants please respond negatively or positively to the reassignment of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle to the 6lo WG?  I will take feedback until Oct. 28th, 2013.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email