Re: Email Subaddressing

Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com> Thu, 31 July 1997 22:10 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa25149; 31 Jul 97 18:10 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid SAA00542; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 18:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id OAA02131 for ietf-822-bks; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 14:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM (SYSTEM@THOR.INNOSOFT.COM [192.160.253.66]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA02126 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eleanor.innosoft.com ("port 51688"@ELEANOR.INNOSOFT.COM) by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.1-8 #8694) with SMTP id <01ILW2A9MMAG8WXMBW@INNOSOFT.COM> for ietf-822@imc.org; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 14:47:39 PDT
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 14:49:29 -0700
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>
Subject: Re: Email Subaddressing
In-reply-to: <19970731194514.8105.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu>
Cc: ietf-822@imc.org
Message-id: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970731144608.6172Z-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Originator-Info: login-id=chris; server=thor.innosoft.com
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> It would be possible to do something different. Many delivery agents
> record the envelope recipient in a usable format. The MUA could read the
> subaddress and use it for sorting. Chris, would it violate your ``MUST
> NOT automatically create new folders'' requirement if the MUA showed the
> user a list of the subaddresses that had been shown up, and allowed the
> user to browse each subaddress as a folder?

Not as long as the MUA also allows browsing them in a single interface.

The requirement stems from the security issue of not wanting to
unintentially cede control of one's folder namespace to others.  It
probably should be a "SHOULD NOT" with clearer explaination.

		- Chris