IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Email Subaddressing

"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu> Fri, 01 August 1997 00:50 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa01493; 31 Jul 97 20:50 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid UAA01003; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 20:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id RAA03905 for ietf-822-bks; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (qmailr@koobera.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.247]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA03901 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10446 invoked by uid 666); 1 Aug 1997 00:29:53 -0000
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:29:53 -0000
Message-ID: <19970801002953.10445.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu>
To: ietf-822@imc.org
Subject: Re: Email Subaddressing
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk

> Is there any way to make the answer be "yes"

MTAs and LDAs that don't support what the users want are thrown away.

Mailing list owners want per-recipient VERPs, for example. sendmail
doesn't support per-recipient VERPs. So they switch to qmail.

This is called competition. It's how the real world makes progress.

> other than standardizing the format subaddresses?

It's none of your business how a host interprets its local addresses.

---Dan
Set up a new mailing list in a single command. http://pobox.com/~djb/ezmlm.html

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status