Re: [Acme] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Considerations about ACME BoF

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 28 March 2015 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB211A87DE for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 240mzUPRLI2r for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C8621A87BF for <acme@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FBCBEB1; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:01:36 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wBQ-TEqDpuKI; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:01:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.32.65.98] (unknown [31.221.87.78]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 737BEBEAF; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:01:35 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5516B43F.2000806@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:01:35 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <551569F6.8020507@openca.org> <551570AA.7080001@cs.tcd.ie> <CABkgnnV0QCsHihGyb2qLYBUL+9s908VKG-ZaE8FwDHrgOpYrbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV0QCsHihGyb2qLYBUL+9s908VKG-ZaE8FwDHrgOpYrbg@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/PCNZhJWVtif-k0kEF_CAX-YjQkM>
Cc: Massimiliano Pala <director@openca.org>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Considerations about ACME BoF
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:01:39 -0000


On 28/03/15 04:57, Martin Thomson wrote:
> 2015-03-27 10:00 GMT-05:00 Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>ie>:
>> DXrxwlJ+snHskMXl7T3Q8QBoKukLeHVHE5MP/vyHWU6pjsOu5QeG79Rz/RHxIK/0
>> /1N/W2vSwIHvsuf1a963x7lcATxqOEILq7rrewlBQqWce/qpjw2DMEs3hSwRtnMc
>> epUY3EzVMHPgH0ccpruWCBKcdmGn9Bil4eRHtw/tYLv88OE/KU/T2fbcvAapnoxC
>> /cZkicXkBanYnq0b4FoNIWwhT4/XhVIWGH4mFb8qPdy0TgRP8t7+E5FBRT7o8SuT
>> Wk55oWgYyH36oe85vbaQyVQgxKMpNOQLmTPgMOKsU1RB0f10YxbOKmfdxrfpjVdb
> 
> 
> It's good to see that you are enthusiastic about encryption
> everywhere.  I personally hope that we don't lose sight of the
> secondary goal of usability in the quest for better security.

Yep, nicely ironic. But see my next mail where I apologized for
whatever enigmail bug caused that. (And here's hoping it doesn't
affect this;-)

S.


> 
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>