Re: [Add] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-01.txt

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 23/03/2021 02:31, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> I suppose this is in reference to
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/LAChEeAQa9_0zDEbPWhshYgEuGo/
> I think I meant something quite similar to what I said earlier in this
> thread: policy is a conversation between people, not machines, so the
> logical place for it is in something more or less like a captive portal
> ToS, where the user may contemplate all of the network's policies together.

Really? That doesn't seem defensible to me fwiw.

Do you have an example of such a ToS description that is
really a conversation between people? I can't think of one.

While I don't agree with Paul V. that this WG ought try
describe complex policies (and in particular I think we
ought not attempt to reduce current policies to PDUs used
when discovering DNS server features), the idea that a
person has an opportunity for a discussion with another
person whilst accessing a network via a captive portal
seems fictional at best.

But maybe you meant something else or I'm just confused?

Ta,
S.