Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 27 February 2020 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7323A0861 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKD61i8txHE8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E7C3A0853 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id x97so869080ota.6 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6Ayd4frP60SHmOz+7aP4Pym11T4N/LEa2fwqUCbxd1A=; b=b2HoSDTZZuQwGC8hUE4Hu37gzCIOfi/oIQJ0mAhAlveOwWVIsxWV35DHsGx3B4gV+x g9WT0RPteIA5TaEIDgdiotBYYLjYGaJq/VuWGPniWAvfBsaPBVxqdLjbT+bTpUVhoOZx h02U9EzowryoYXL4aDdjF1gsCIXRA1QKYVmco/ItuU6u83UlR4DibgO0XiRiSF3jZxWt Xh7YNqw9rum+lrb2MmenFbrgUFYLMoERW7b+HeF5L4YoTVOq4u42pRA3TWYMzdkLFfwO hcGSZqvDHWk86m2dABeYY9fHECiT8W/6Ulz8Lli4IcWNUTICCvmkrSrfbdiUPyJ8MwhD 2Idw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6Ayd4frP60SHmOz+7aP4Pym11T4N/LEa2fwqUCbxd1A=; b=a6ZqcS48Qy/i3PD5eJtLFZR4FMPlKrqWx97Ua1iIj5yCVF4hqaOSeT3r1tc2yQRTFH gCoDK5wxLMuV/GK9rVpUcwAhx9fUvAFCWztXtlOY1rgkSRkNYqJwsAKyZbay/wdtHTjo Ir+vjAzzf/zW8EExRsYLjTQNK5MtY2zQKE5wEkPuud+rTLznxUeIZVxrp4rVP+7VndL6 KZHXNbcgVwGKXyKnBwIm3QZ/3Dt5Dira1ScdAzE++C2FEUDQR/Iz0NB8JKCiFXB937Vh hTkYLHMn+1ZSSxeaoAecKmid8XUxvV82GKNqG7pD/sXq6kAz1uQW7Wo/UjgwxFiJ1ibk FJqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVgmpH8iJAtzJgVN8QMpmcVOxt+GECbs6BJFUM0MCx+2j8I4Weq sYv9x4vtJk0YwoJWolXQAmN0jL8ts/x1HOoWk31Ppg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznMOdVZutlQ6R0FxFE24MSs4TLRW/emjhQBODrGJvHzSVmoZ1Z1R/rvnfdyuiUci+DEo4vDRvyfU1gtpSo/68=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:160c:: with SMTP id g12mr1023726otr.82.1582845069190; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <876c9105-3da4-e614-2db0-bea025b54663@si6networks.com> <7749f91f-03f1-cc14-bae8-5fe68c88879f@si6networks.com> <CALx6S36wN7VEi_rxLC1ETcTvkGaPhs20KhQrGWAGGTrCL5OT+g@mail.gmail.com> <d41a94f5ede994b9e14605871f9f7140@strayalpha.com> <CAOj+MMFo=7G6ygCNEkwNXzzzdbYh7Aw6SzcjL_Atg6RGyDJdjA@mail.gmail.com> <435b3561fd446be01d7d464e0c0762c5@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <435b3561fd446be01d7d464e0c0762c5@strayalpha.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:10:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFL_O7MRUc_Lea=_qp0Lkpd5n16naSeb9Gr9PifUz=1_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, architecture-discuss@iab.org, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001588c6059f96d64e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/ROKz-ixSUAQFOGJNVhor1hp2ERk>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:11:18 -0000

> It does matter whether it happens at the IP source (origin host, tunnel
ingress, etc.) or on the path of that header.

It happens on tunnel ingress and tunnel egress nodes (egress = node listed
in DA of the packet).