Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed

"Chris Lewis" <clewis@nortel.com> Thu, 04 March 2010 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <CLEWIS@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B373A8DD3 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:43:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hsub5hb8ppf for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E153A8D69 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (casmtp.ca.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id o24JhNl23991 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:43:23 GMT
Received: from zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com ([47.140.202.65]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:43:23 -0500
Received: from [47.130.80.251] (47.130.80.251) by zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com (47.140.202.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.340.0; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:43:22 -0500
Message-ID: <4B900D59.2030709@nortel.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:43:21 -0500
From: Chris Lewis <clewis@nortel.com>
Organization: Nortel
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <20100302131810.GA22938@gsp.org> <4B8D3FD1.8090403@nortel.com> <BF533A28DBE487489EAB3411C5412CBE1032EE5B@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net> <41D5397E-E5B8-4508-9393-E25CB307641F@thenose.net> <4B8FC0A6.3060903@nd.edu> <19343.64926.580332.14019@world.std.com> <19343.65528.11453.513185@world.std.com>
In-Reply-To: <19343.65528.11453.513185@world.std.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2010 19:43:23.0557 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3757D50:01CABBD2]
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:43:27 -0000

On 3/4/2010 1:46 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> On March 4, 2010 at 13:36 bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) wrote:
>   >
>   >  I'll reiterate into the mawing abyss: If he's not paying me to deliver
>   >  it, it's spam. Thumbs down.
>
> I'll wildly guess I meant "yawning" not "mawing" which is only a word
> in coffee-deficient-land.

I'll accept "mawing" as a short form for "into the maw of the".  Just 
this one time ;-)