Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem?

John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com> Wed, 18 January 2006 18:03 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EzHea-0006mC-9c; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:03:28 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EzHeY-0006kR-Mi for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:03:26 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09464 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:02:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com ([208.31.42.42]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzHmw-0003m2-1J for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:12:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 16709 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2006 18:03:25 -0000
Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 18 Jan 2006 18:03:25 -0000
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:03:28 -0000
Message-ID: <20060118180328.41973.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem?
In-Reply-To: <OF0E1B735B.463D9215-ON802570FA.003052DA-802570FA.0035048C@slc.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Danny_Angus@slc.co.uk
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org

>IMHO any "IFUSSP" solution would probably need to meet the following
>requirements..

This is a nice list.  Any chance you could work it up into a draft of
proposed criteria for anti-spam techniques?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg