Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-06> for your review
"li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Wed, 24 January 2024 04:17 UTC
Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EDDC14F70E; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3SQCBWrSvGb; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from AUS01-SY4-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sy4aus01olkn20801.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f403:2819::801]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F164BC15108B; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:17:11 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=S4kJtOx/v6Cdpx3Qn6WbJ9YhTqhjIzSnRGiZ8GB3YWDeB6FpbfF8Cj5CedQCJhFOJvQNqIgvH/hGhTkrBaDp3p7PENLCaeLVTextfjO7jHBH/uO2R08cBLS7w9K11i69BHPo7Fl1jflaFzpwPdFs6AoUfGeAnWaeKu/+VZoH18UiMwzB03pPtOz+xrgPhTTMs4Ip42j/cPHw5EFlZCJbUAKjMLYTYZBMFPlYwWamqSxQcBB0cPytivyKM/egDqcWRxnWt4PpjU71FlHFmzWIHmK5VqEUkE3JF4vjWINe3oohQi4E+sxhEkBx8e8RaEu9cu3ZS0G2eWmJBGeK2vCGIw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=pOqFUjTNBNdzdTidBHWoETRYXxmvVG/INedbHqCKmLQ=; b=C8qpTo8S3vgO/RH1313HRhnfDqYb1xrbKXNqvA7cyh2EnAK1rpLyxOHYuE4gRN6rlW5hNMrN6EcZaX3DW+7GsjHa6lDOWMo2kUfmrkOSR2kx61iYq4yDdEnh+kYs/wWJIackZCkkGRotGbCTNbqtUuM6g60713/uZeJc0q14JZmTv+AEYIBdRFWiKnt5c7QkA2COXvdQi7lYlYpMbpM6MXPnB6EnIwV6D7WbPpunlK/KQs8uYgd25yptRH/PQF8dErf/7lzDYuJD4MlX/vEmQGL5tABKMcvhfyaicYfJICiElUiYAJLXl6sj5+/sNAbrePJZTj+7mjlz9aUUYEOrcw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=pOqFUjTNBNdzdTidBHWoETRYXxmvVG/INedbHqCKmLQ=; b=ergtog2x1dnhwQavBpHXGmKTHbwfVZ2z/d6M/NrVWtXtzS5x08rJ3InRg8qUZvm3BAuY9Wj+s1dfNxUFuGx4fUJ2FeiVNVtOt9SWFo1DitKUSHywnKZ3MtSP5j+ZlSFU8+fA0br/xq1NRcz749Zo3boboLyyiMCma1PnnFI2mqdPbJLpP9cToTQ0Rm1sMYHV30iqXtfLBFbi4NDMNddEjgL0lxGPoZHUyNDMvATge7b7eThgwLHAblXJJC+IeHAYOYTPALQXksEN0oIrSI5Mml+YNI37pc4KHYtESnBiytbqoyXC/aE2caw0/zPqrX1C1LSq6B2wNygaoZGnPFW+4Q==
Received: from MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10c6:220:157::9) by SY6P282MB3944.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10c6:10:1d8::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7202.30; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:17:05 +0000
Received: from MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a09c:d2d9:2194:1470]) by MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a09c:d2d9:2194:1470%4]) with mapi id 15.20.7228.022; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:17:05 +0000
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:17:25 +0800
From: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "guo.jun2@zte.com.cn" <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
Cc: "ippm-ads@ietf.org" <ippm-ads@ietf.org>, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "marcus.ihlar" <marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, "Zhukeyi (Kaiyin, Enterprise NE)" <zhukeyi@huawei.com>
References: <20240123184451.AC7D6E7C65@rfcpa.amsl.com>, <52524822aeea42658ebc0e3d7d2c4bf9@huawei.com>
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.213[cn]
Message-ID: <SY4P282MB293321F886B92B1C02BBEC82FC7B2@SY4P282MB2933.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart484748673283_=----"
X-TMN: [ga+LaLxZtC86/zU0bpuOogOX+XrmI8jB]
X-ClientProxiedBy: TYCPR01CA0173.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:400:2b2::11) To SY4P282MB2933.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10c6:10:15c::5)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <202401241217181622725@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MEYP282MB2942:EE_|SY6P282MB3944:EE_
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: fac2f9c0-36d4-4fe0-469a-08dc1c9351d7
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-4755-11-msonline-outlook-746f3.templateTenant
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fac2f9c0-36d4-4fe0-469a-08dc1c9351d7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SY4P282MB2933.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2024 04:17:05.7128 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SY6P282MB3944
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/4ekaktfOvyoQYCY-SnqDAB81fAE>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-06> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:17:27 -0000
Hello Editor and coauthors, I agree the keywords provided by Tianran and the changes made by our editor. Thank you. Best Regards, Zhenqiang Li China Mobile li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com From: Tianran Zhou Date: 2024-01-24 09:39 To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com; guo.jun2@zte.com.cn; gregimirsky@gmail.com; rgandhi@cisco.com CC: ippm-ads@ietf.org; ippm-chairs@ietf.org; marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com; martin.h.duke@gmail.com; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org; Zhukeyi(Kaiyin,Datacom Standard&Patent) Subject: RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-06> for your review Hi Editor, Thanks very much for this revision. Please see in line with my confirmation. Best, Tianran -----Original Message----- From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 2:45 AM To: li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com; Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>; guo.jun2@zte.com.cn; gregimirsky@gmail.com; rgandhi@cisco.com Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; ippm-ads@ietf.org; ippm-chairs@ietf.org; marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com; martin.h.duke@gmail.com; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-06> for your review Authors, While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) the following questions, which are also in the XML file. 1) <!-- [rfced] We have updated the title of the document by expanding LAG. Please let us know if any changes are necessary. Original: Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for Performance Measurement on LAG Current: Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for Performance Measurement on a Link Aggregation Group --> ZTR> Agreed. 2) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. --> ZTR> STAMP, Performance Measurement, LAG, Micro Session 3) <!-- [rfced] Section 1. We would like to clarify the use of "tuple" in the sentence below: Current: One STAMP test session over the LAG can measure the performance of a member link with fixed five tuples, or it can measure an average of some or all member links of the LAG by varying the five tuples. Perhaps (updating "five tuple" to "5-tuple", which is more commonly used; making the first use of "tuple" singular; and changing "varying the five tuples" to "specifying their 5-tuples"): One STAMP test session over the LAG can measure the performance of a member link using its fixed 5-tuple, or it can measure an average of some or all member links of the LAG by specifying their 5-tuples. --> ZTR> Agreed. 4) <!-- [rfced] [IEEE802.1AX] 802.1AX-2008 has been superseded by 802.1AX-2014. Would you like to update the reference? Current: [IEEE802.1AX] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Link Aggregation", IEEE Std 802.1AX-2008, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2008.4668665, November 2008, <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4668665>. --> ZTR> I checked the IEEE802.1AX standard. The latest one is 802.1AX-2020. I would like to update the reference information as follows: IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Link Aggregation", IEEE Std 802.1AX-2020, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9105034, May 2020, <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9105034>. 5) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> and let us know if any changes are needed. Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should still be reviewed as a best practice. --> ZTR> Agreed. 6) <!-- [rfced] FYI - We have added expansions for abbreviations upon first use per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please review each expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness. --> ZTR> Agreed. Thank you. RFC Editor/jm On 1/23/24 12:41 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: *****IMPORTANT***** Updated 2024/01/23 RFC Author(s): -------------- Instructions for Completing AUTH48 Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/). You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing your approval. Planning your review --------------------- Please review the following aspects of your document: * RFC Editor questions Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as follows: <!-- [rfced] ... --> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. * Changes submitted by coauthors Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. * Content Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular attention to: - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) - contact information - references * Copyright notices and legends Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/). * Semantic markup Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that <sourcecode> and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>. * Formatted output Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. Submitting changes ------------------ To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties include: * your coauthors * rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team) * other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). * auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion list: * More info: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc * The archive itself: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter). If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and its addition will be noted at the top of the message. You may submit your changes in one of two ways: An update to the provided XML file — OR — An explicit list of changes in this format Section # (or indicate Global) OLD: old text NEW: new text You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit list of changes, as either form is sufficient. We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, and technical changes. Information about stream managers can be found in the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager. Approving for publication -------------------------- To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval. Files ----- The files are available here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534.txt Diff file of the text: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534-rfcdiff.html (side by side) For your convenience, we have also created an alt-diff file that will allow you to more easily view changes where text has been deleted or moved: http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534-alt-diff.html Diff of the XML: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534-xmldiff1.html The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own diff files of the XML. Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534.original.v2v3.xml XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates only: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9534.form.xml Tracking progress ----------------- The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9534 Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation, RFC Editor -------------------------------------- RFC9534 (draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-06) Title : Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for Performance Measurement on LAG Author(s) : Z. Li, T. Zhou, J. Guo, G. Mirsky, R. Gandhi WG Chair(s) : Marcus Ihlar, Tommy Pauly Area Director(s) : Martin Duke, Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-ippm-… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… guo.jun2
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9534 <draft-ietf-i… Jean Mahoney