IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 07 October 2022 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C2AC1524AB for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrwOech465wj for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com (mail-wr1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B42C14CE25 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id r13so8004526wrj.11 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ne07JW9Hw6cordZQQkm7VyjQg5QNbhESxLrRayulOh0=; b=0IqttrbzdXqG/J/RRv8rSP9IKN1YORrjHKRmZBEfxEt4afbhsV93HdvqlzHMBdh7ug apF2Ghsc7IoAD1JSRx0MlLD7wk5nEaQUkf8r/uN+REOr8LjN3pjTKNGKfwn9aq8YC3Pu 3fOuSAj+eCDKNexvSaNQ/s7HIADzBg1+gIM2Y97VAaskZefz4Tn9WckJEQUlbeW+z9VT /5m8iG6+5MNhFWs6XyAOhGTh0SGNWiaxs0uy3gzRNlfIi8vs3jzeZRymequKaS1ighau 9cSDyP8z1ebPGKDIEcrto66WB25WY5Bb/c2C/ojUa+flC18GE/mo8PRbGXURblJs/fIj gaZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ne07JW9Hw6cordZQQkm7VyjQg5QNbhESxLrRayulOh0=; b=T0qpwd4uAutZrif7XKxuNqEDyFwbuhYEc47/JeETBXgUu4uyH0z6gmKWysO0u7HCZO SCXgW3C280+nQ2BRD+TK1n4h7+x5JxFCscfwnsRJZ8sjqeQdDl6Z3GaB+HgepE9ZFhkz 90BQlqiy0ZHk/GiPybybWUn3w2AbkDiGvwxn+jsb5pCik+rhg9m313gs8pzhhsfGz4f8 lCP0pb0ZivSDRuTq9VTsGKeEvWqU6W5/gLMPk3UhTU+NMcoLmdGomEsmdWuuvsJWebrA TT72a0zB0ZD8wozu6UuxDxU1wgiSx5K/2+RLF37HaeFawbu1TL9IOC9iVWfbswZhkSH5 iqJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf29N9fdzOkGCCpFNy0lbRdqSs9kMbxnH7bJJrTqLZ/DIvkOlu3w DUsGREZCZU5bnFYMxY6LEEusBQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4qzNsfMC4iatWjrpnJwU+lLazAw+vy2m5j0ZB16zB8pRB7uw691+3MlIvCg5af0AUbDod/iQ==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea08:0:b0:22e:46e9:2a8a with SMTP id q8-20020adfea08000000b0022e46e92a8amr3941788wrm.636.1665159799828; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a01:e0a:1ec:470:e54d:bb39:66da:7115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s4-20020adff804000000b00226dedf1ab7sm2401566wrp.76.2022.10.07.09.23.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 18:23:18 +0200
Message-Id: <A59A4FAC-6DB0-4605-91F9-162B302AB986@gigix.net>
References: <F9749B02-69ED-4C71-B7A1-EB1C1C4C97D1@amsl.com>
Cc: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Vince Fuller <vince.fuller@gmail.com>, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, Albert Cabellos Aparicio <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>, lisp-ads@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
In-Reply-To: <F9749B02-69ED-4C71-B7A1-EB1C1C4C97D1@amsl.com>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (19H12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/6GvufI2g-KXgbgJ2ihKoNGqvTbA>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:23:25 -0000

I the reply from the shepherd ok? ;-) 

To me the change is OK.

Ciao

L.


> On 7 Oct 2022, at 18:18, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Greetings authors,
> 
> As we prepare this RFC for publication, we note that there is a reference to RFC 2858 which has been obsoleted by RFC 4760.  May we update the reference to refer to RFC 4760?  
> 
> Note that a reply from one of you is sufficient at this time. 
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/sg
> 
> 
>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 8:37 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Dino,
>> 
>> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9300
>> 
>> You may track the AUTH48 progress of all documents in C381 at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C381
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> RFC Editor/ap
>> 
>>>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 6:34 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 5:40 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that, since we have already received all approvals, we only need 1 author to review the changes and let us know if they are agreeable or if any further changes are needed.
>>> 
>>> I just reviewed all the changes. They look good. 
>>> 
>>> Dino
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email