Re: [auth48] [C381] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 September 2022 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93675C153384; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LDtVvKNlwXDn; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D42C1527A4; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id h188so17162854pgc.12; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=b+vSPMMDqRa64vXhca5ilQ4yz+qSKGkrmoVnI8Xgw4M=; b=BXCboFg/ssLMTxkM4Mq0LGBMZ0rbJMdfNsJzK3Ilom6hM2QP44bo3Ngd0E48BTxu4j zk4Iv9N0PaW3ezAXCCqdZwRpXqsIpm5Sq8vWXmrVLounpbTqhNNL3+/9KFVX0QCRE2pd 5HU5tVgTihAygj5wlZbK5CkMXDDqA6dd55+sHgwnxbK6OgGXlWjMLc/ebkTvKUoBj93v 7WjXhsOmoi0CFZgJ96K0hikqZ5oeZEc7iWx5Osc87AbsYun936G7HisWDuvyEZ86eA1S beQkqKkOajHJ0Q9ZbKpM5cpcDhbZIhTQuaPsiUZOV78Z26EcSSDkoI5JbQ7+Yug/+ajA N+rQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=b+vSPMMDqRa64vXhca5ilQ4yz+qSKGkrmoVnI8Xgw4M=; b=h/1zWw47tBfRfXkyU1TR4210IpeWE1DWhue7phlQ4RuXNedPpNY4YnHROxZfAi51U5 OajAECM/1VVhtR9oImUKCcUpZ/CAYbQ+WpVzy59KNUGknzUSrmbxcaO4dn6hFLPbEGbI lSdLzZ+zfKjb5FnP3YGOp/hnbimRAG1RYSdva66Il91nFtE6tVAm5wOeBWh75v6NN7sA J1zQqhY5z3z/0YVVA/vZUA1MN2I8IYgrZlxPyT21kHfHGca/vgevBTmWTShA2cCIUrmk MwkO5cNnCvnZNOOESWx+PFjV0xNPUvKeOFWi8n4/VcmR+wi9GhiV7h7W3n5ZiVMmZ23Q fwtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo03yeucbjace/xftKmyIR6Z2kGFPZGV8C+UGZ2V5v05XVWg4wHJ t3qpazeQdzfybduJ2RkMDpubt0O+Okf2AvuCwk0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7J2MEarxUEf5Q8OlGeasBKvRonbBcKU6/+CLdt/qO6153Ie1yV+umfY/xybVPMFN1hYS9Kr7fNeFbFuQ7LsWs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4393:b0:52f:3603:e62f with SMTP id bt19-20020a056a00439300b0052f3603e62fmr9625312pfb.23.1662653024825; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:03:44 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220908000055.ECC4BC88A3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20220908000055.ECC4BC88A3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:03:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsw09g5jFS3FxDdNk_MacGstXf+Q+gKmZa6__+RUh7xaHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: vince.fuller@gmail.com, farinacci@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, acabello@ac.upc.edu, darlewis@cisco.com, dmm@1-4-5.net
Cc: ggx@gigix.net, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, lisp-ads@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000edf9ed05e82c926f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/8FU6ENOHmm2W3a3Q0HwDyGbCyzM>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:03:49 -0000

Hi!

As Dino mentioned, the change was discussed in the WG.  I approve.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On September 7, 2022 at 8:01:00 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org) wrote:


1) <!-- [rfced] *AD: Quite a few updates were made in Section 13.2 of
the most recent version (-38) of this document. Please review, and
let us know if you approve.

You can easily view the diff here:
https://www.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-36&url2=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38
-->