IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Fri, 07 October 2022 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7012BC1522C0; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s19yv87vQuXH; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E35C14CE25; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8848425C35A; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k03yw-heUgu0; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2603-8000-9603-b513-c871-6f2d-c789-092a.res6.spectrum.com [IPv6:2603:8000:9603:b513:c871:6f2d:c789:92a]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72D4D425977A; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8D172B7-291C-4EB5-9367-6031E19000DF@amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:17:53 -0700
Cc: Vince Fuller <vince.fuller@gmail.com>, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, Albert Cabellos Aparicio <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>, lisp-ads@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9749B02-69ED-4C71-B7A1-EB1C1C4C97D1@amsl.com>
References: <308C3402-A79B-4DDF-B2DB-E00546FF487F@amsl.com> <09E2288F-3F56-4DB1-BEDD-10ED98D78765@gmail.com> <F8D172B7-291C-4EB5-9367-6031E19000DF@amsl.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/FAleu0osasut_JJS5FxS-8M2wxk>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:18:37 -0000

Greetings authors,

As we prepare this RFC for publication, we note that there is a reference to RFC 2858 which has been obsoleted by RFC 4760.  May we update the reference to refer to RFC 4760?  

Note that a reply from one of you is sufficient at this time. 

Thank you,
RFC Editor/sg


> On Sep 22, 2022, at 8:37 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino,
> 
> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9300
> 
> You may track the AUTH48 progress of all documents in C381 at:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C381
> 
> Best regards,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 6:34 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 5:40 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please note that, since we have already received all approvals, we only need 1 author to review the changes and let us know if they are agreeable or if any further changes are needed.
>> 
>> I just reviewed all the changes. They look good. 
>> 
>> Dino
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email