IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Fri, 07 October 2022 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FF6C14CF04; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWDzoLNJ2DmB; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59795C14CF1B; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DAE425C37B; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ntnbnlm-TlG7; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2603-8000-9603-b513-c871-6f2d-c789-092a.res6.spectrum.com [IPv6:2603:8000:9603:b513:c871:6f2d:c789:92a]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEAEB425977A; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <A59A4FAC-6DB0-4605-91F9-162B302AB986@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:31:03 -0700
Cc: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Vince Fuller <vince.fuller@gmail.com>, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, Albert Cabellos Aparicio <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>, lisp-ads@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81E59DB3-8C09-4ACD-AD0F-B8999AEFEDC7@amsl.com>
References: <F9749B02-69ED-4C71-B7A1-EB1C1C4C97D1@amsl.com> <A59A4FAC-6DB0-4605-91F9-162B302AB986@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/CsSH-RDZsA10NX9wB1MaRGmxwYs>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:31:47 -0000

Hi Luigi,

Yes, a reply from the shepherd is ok — thank you for your quick reply.  We will update the document and continue preparing the cluster for publication.

Thank you,
RFC Editor/sg

> On Oct 7, 2022, at 9:23 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> I the reply from the shepherd ok? ;-) 
> 
> To me the change is OK.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
> 
> 
>> On 7 Oct 2022, at 18:18, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings authors,
>> 
>> As we prepare this RFC for publication, we note that there is a reference to RFC 2858 which has been obsoleted by RFC 4760.  May we update the reference to refer to RFC 4760?  
>> 
>> Note that a reply from one of you is sufficient at this time. 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> RFC Editor/sg
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 8:37 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Dino,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9300
>>> 
>>> You may track the AUTH48 progress of all documents in C381 at:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C381
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 6:34 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 22, 2022, at 5:40 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please note that, since we have already received all approvals, we only need 1 author to review the changes and let us know if they are agreeable or if any further changes are needed.
>>>> 
>>>> I just reviewed all the changes. They look good. 
>>>> 
>>>> Dino
>>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email