IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Fri, 09 September 2022 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163A4C152711; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rr1WwuOmkgru; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5365AC152588; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFF44280C11; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IW6QbLGX9Dw9; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amss-mbp.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:14ed:4aef:1765:f693]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3DCB4243E49; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyDX5H3xpazyCesVFrMRO083OARGSdv0YAWDX3n6MSYtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:19:17 -0700
Cc: Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, Vince Fuller <vince.fuller@gmail.com>, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, Darrel Lewis <darlewis@cisco.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, lisp-ads@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C306F31C-9E99-4D59-BDCC-AA6E8237159E@amsl.com>
References: <E1F1EF68-685D-445E-B39A-671DA3BA4E4D@gigix.net> <39FA2ABB-CC98-40D7-B40E-99301DA36997@gmail.com> <E211D151-FB7E-4460-820A-F43DC013519E@amsl.com> <CAMMESsyDX5H3xpazyCesVFrMRO083OARGSdv0YAWDX3n6MSYtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/mBtTPyOYGrRZnqLJRs3yWvsTVw4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 18:19:22 -0000

Hi Alvaro and Dino,

Thank you for your replies. We have noted Alvaro’s approval on the AUTH48 status page:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9300

Dino, note that we made “nonce” lowercase for consistency throughout the document. If you prefer otherwise, please let us know. 

> a Nonce / a nonce (e.g., "a nonce", "a Nonce value")

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.xml
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.html
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.pdf

The relevant diff files have been posted here:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-lastdiff.html (last version to this one)

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Sep 9, 2022, at 4:00 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alanna:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I looked at the diff and the changes are fine.  I approve.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> On September 8, 2022 at 7:32:43 PM, Alanna Paloma (apaloma@amsl.com) wrote:
> 
>> Authors and *Alvaro, 
>> 
>> *Alvaro - As the AD, please review and approve of the added and updated key words in Sections 4, 4.1, 4.2, 5, and 7.1 in the diff file below. 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-auth48diff.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email