IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Fri, 23 September 2022 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46172C1524B3; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAd_3n_uJoAa; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ADD1C1522CC; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCA8425A37E; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d58IweM4gz0u; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amss-mbp.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:b477:39c7:d17:8e74]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1680425977A; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <286CECBE-FB91-46D8-83DD-6AF08EE8ACDA@amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:28 -0700
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, Albert Cabellos Aparicio <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>, lisp-ads@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <308C3402-A79B-4DDF-B2DB-E00546FF487F@amsl.com>
References: <83DBC424-5E9B-494A-B2F8-020A83468E51@amsl.com> <CEDF2F79-5625-4B20-B76C-F1F7F7A02C37@gmail.com> <4D7B4EEA-9DBA-49BF-B68D-6A93CF8FAB10@upc.edu> <E116B39E-7B47-4E89-BF31-01E999784931@amsl.com> <CAMMESswnChz+4tmC2mrishvvCiyF3jap=Yh96HKO7nN-PccAvw@mail.gmail.com> <286CECBE-FB91-46D8-83DD-6AF08EE8ACDA@amsl.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Vince Fuller <vince.fuller@gmail.com>, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/c5tu5AZXwLVKkdbPrUWkb2jE78E>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:40:33 -0000

Hi Authors,

We have updated the files per Dino’s response to the cluster-wide queries, and we have updated Dino’s, Darrel’s, and Albert's affiliation information.

Please note that, since we have already received all approvals, we only need 1 author to review the changes and let us know if they are agreeable or if any further changes are needed.

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.pdf
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.html
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300.xml

The relevant diff files are posted here:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9300-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Sep 14, 2022, at 1:31 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> With Alvaro's approval in place of Vince and Dave, we have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9300
> 
> As this document is part of Cluster C381, you may track the progress of all documents in this cluster through AUTH48 at:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C381
> 
> We will move this document forward in the publication process once the other necessary documents in the cluster complete AUTH48 as well.
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
> 
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2022, at 11:55 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Alanna:
>> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Given the approvals received so far, and the fact that Vince and Dave (the remaining authors) are retired from IETF work, please consider this note my approval on their behalf.
>> 
>>  https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/auth48/ 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Alvaro. 
>> 
>> On September 13, 2022 at 11:50:55 AM, Alanna Paloma (apaloma@amsl.com) wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Albert, 
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: 
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9300 
>>> 
>>> Best regards, 
>>> RFC Editor/ap
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email