Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 12 September 2022 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E637EC1524C3; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iX0RXfEwoaSt; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4EAC1526E9; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id bh13so9453906pgb.4; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=uuW0yuWhVpxA8LqvyF4H6jSfYixgGAddEyHzys1kNYI=; b=GZU3WYhOgcMMQsqpsgtMnPHnc/XvsixOl9XRLA7ydJ5z9ZQxbT+BwrWZKOV0osIG68 8aDgj5rvtRgHM/flYEpp/zfTomgQb5kzHpHVrRj+3RAh483tRUAqNz0dbVjVCecxE2I0 ENV0DpepcfbN1h+2tp4QV2suzLHZd0ieG7a37C/YhSApxQx9arldavALK9rfARyBCyDu GvbUBobMfe0DQgKch/qSsof4VYv3rB9i6xgJbvXywDN7ZzCo7UDasc+c37PpJ8Vixlbf IJ75YpKHmt8oLPJ2czCoTxml20+Z/DpaVng2v90GqTo//PoydzOqwN8yG3sUA5tCIO4W RY4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=uuW0yuWhVpxA8LqvyF4H6jSfYixgGAddEyHzys1kNYI=; b=xF6zr3BYfBL8bGSh6suupOWZSh7WiFO6H9X3P1I3Gi1T3BiB8o45pRVA21NVMNCTg6 asBY7J6o/8c0VPEZFESM+YwcPgZakjbKvq99Uuwh+DuEVLoDsLF8s1BmodIALZcV50sF o1rmPbJ3+pzvxcfSJJ23D0fApL+LAqmJhFohoF1CvORiB2/N4eo/f5InYBKl/6QE8qBW CtmkBbK7NqaUD5gMoeF+etKoCCuG1nPLh/aCJeURRwYQEUzeK2vACee4TKidjJVU29X+ iT/T94FCjkaxqy5X3mMQVhL6QKPxlyBOETzBIYo7X+pA6m9t0UWP+gKpxKAuhjedKmhC D95Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1sQOsHS/2zV2y/ri2v3MuhEcL742lr/VTkPzCOBY/zjCgpN5PF leMrjVtqafQjemeUW/zN7jM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5BCupPuMnm31aFT6rxxME/ZzRqA8z/Djk9xLTvOduqkAIO+OyzPuf6IO4q1E+OizdyvVc1VA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:82c1:0:b0:434:ac18:f6e with SMTP id w184-20020a6382c1000000b00434ac180f6emr24743315pgd.120.1663017808603; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-98-234-33-188.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.234.33.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x2-20020a655382000000b00412a708f38asm6155223pgq.35.2022.09.12.14.23.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F014F750-23DB-40ED-AE96-DC967465D014@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_28E2BDFC-676E-47D5-A341-C42535B97F52"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:23:26 -0700
In-Reply-To: <A772CA7B-EC6C-4FF9-924B-BB56AA090D5C@amsl.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, Vince Fuller <vince.fuller@gmail.com>, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, Darrel Lewis <darlewis@cisco.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, lisp-ads@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
To: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
References: <E1F1EF68-685D-445E-B39A-671DA3BA4E4D@gigix.net> <39FA2ABB-CC98-40D7-B40E-99301DA36997@gmail.com> <E211D151-FB7E-4460-820A-F43DC013519E@amsl.com> <CAMMESsyDX5H3xpazyCesVFrMRO083OARGSdv0YAWDX3n6MSYtA@mail.gmail.com> <C306F31C-9E99-4D59-BDCC-AA6E8237159E@amsl.com> <DE3145D3-FBEC-4676-927E-4A17C5BF8746@gmail.com> <A772CA7B-EC6C-4FF9-924B-BB56AA090D5C@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/NsJ4S0n076sx9LtFe2ydj-NuKyE>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9300 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-38> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 21:23:51 -0000

> Note that we have updated two instances of “echo-nonce-request packets” to “echo-nonce request packets”, as well as two instances of “echo-nonce-request-state” to “echo-nonce-request state”. Please review to make sure we interpreted your suggested updates correctly.

The state is not request state, it is actually just "echo-nonce state" like I indicated in the previous email:



> We will await approvals from the remaining authors prior to moving forward with the publication process.

I am not totally sure they are engaged in the process anymore. I can say that for Dave and Vince. But Darrel and Albert may respond. Just an FYI.

Thanks,
Dino