[auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review

[Lynne Bartholomew <[e-mail]>]

Dear Gary, Lizzi, Martijn, and *AD (Murray),

* Murray, please let us know if you approve (1) the removal of Normative Ref. RFC 1945 and (2) a new sentence containing "MUST NOT" in Section 2.2.4.

Gary, thank you very much for the updated XML files!

Martijn, your contact information in the Authors' Addresses section now appears as follows.  Please confirm that this is as desired:

   Martijn Koster (editor)
   Suton Lane
   Wymondham, Norfolk
   NR18 9JG
   United Kingdom
   Email: [e-mail]

The latest files are posted here:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.xml
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-rfcdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-auth48diff.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-xmldiff1.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-xmldiff2.html

Gary, Lizzi, and Martijn, we have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9309

Thanks again!

RFC Editor/lb


> From: Gary Illyes <garyillyes=[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review
> Date: August 29, 2022 at 2:41:50 AM PDT
> To: Martijn Koster <[e-mail]>, Henner Zeller <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> 
> Thank you. Done on github (https://github.com/google/robotstxt/blob/master/protocol-draft/rfc9309.xml#L18) and attached to this email again.
> 
> Henner, we need the last LGTM from you. 


> From: Martijn Koster <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review
> Date: August 29, 2022 at 2:01:13 AM PDT
> To: Gary Illyes <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> 
> Hi Gary,
> 
> Please remove my organisation Stalworthy Computing, Ltd  from
> https://github.com/google/robotstxt/blob/master/protocol-draft/rfc9309.xml#L18
> 
> The rest LGTM
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> — Martijn


> From: Lizzi Sassman <lizzi=[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review
> Date: August 26, 2022 at 12:58:13 PM PDT
> To: Gary Illyes <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail], Martijn Koster <[e-mail]>, Henner Zeller <[e-mail]>, Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], [e-mail]
> 
> The draft LGTM.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lizzi

> On Aug 26, 2022, at 7:08 AM, Gary Illyes <garyillyes=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your edits and review. Lizzi and I addressed the comments received and attached the updated XML to this email (also at https://github.com/google/robotstxt/blob/master/protocol-draft/rfc9309.xml)
> 
> The draft attached looks good to me and from my perspective approved for publication. 
> 
> Martijn, Lizzi, Henner, please review this draft and provide feedback (probably on GitHub) and/or approval for publication.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:24 AM <[e-mail]> wrote:
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2022/08/25
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> 
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and 
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.  
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies 
> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
> 
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties 
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing 
> your approval.
> 
> Planning your review 
> ---------------------
> 
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
> 
> *  RFC Editor questions
> 
>    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor 
>    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as 
>    follows:
> 
>    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> 
>    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors 
> 
>    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your 
>    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you 
>    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> 
> *  Content 
> 
>    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot 
>    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>    - contact information
>    - references
> 
> *  Copyright notices and legends
> 
>    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions 
>    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
> 
> *  Semantic markup
> 
>    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of  
>    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode> 
>    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at 
>    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
> 
> *  Formatted output
> 
>    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the 
>    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is 
>    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting 
>    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> 
> 
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
> 
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all 
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties 
> include:
> 
>    *  your coauthors
> 
>    *  [e-mail] (the RPC team)
> 
>    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., 
>       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the 
>       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> 
>    *  [e-mail], which is a new archival mailing list 
>       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion 
>       list:
> 
>      *  More info:
>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
> 
>      *  The archive itself:
>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
> 
>      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out 
>         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you 
>         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, 
>         [e-mail] will be re-added to the CC list and 
>         its addition will be noted at the top of the message. 
> 
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> 
> An update to the provided XML file
>  — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
> 
> Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
> OLD:
> old text
> 
> NEW:
> new text
> 
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit 
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> 
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, 
> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in 
> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> 
> 
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
> 
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> 
> 
> Files 
> -----
> 
> The files are available here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.xml
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.pdf
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.txt
> 
> Diff file of the text:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-diff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> 
> Diff of the XML: 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-xmldiff1.html
> 
> The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own 
> diff files of the XML.  
> 
> Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.original.v2v3.xml 
> 
> XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates 
> only: 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.form.xml
> 
> 
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
> 
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9309
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.  
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9309 (draft-koster-rep-12)
> 
> Title            : Robots Exclusion Protocol
> Author(s)        : M. Koster, Ed., G. Illyes, Ed., H. Zeller, Ed., L. Sassman, Ed.
> WG Chair(s)      : 
> Area Director(s) : 
> 
> 
> <rfc9309.xml>