Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review

Lizzi Sassman <lizzi@google.com> Fri, 26 August 2022 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lizzi@google.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAFBC14F73D for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fcnv9UmnRAEZ for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA7FC14EB1E for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id q67so2654456vsa.1 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=MBGH46Jr4wvrVpgPQJ0FMEXWJ0trnmysWdYdMG67Ie4=; b=ie4ExR/wv0icRhKg5PBtD3g/Miyn5he/sqQ5WCmAHpPK9ygHbk7ouvmaOtErsemOiu 1xeV2nAqVBfdWxEStZ9xnniOhaFCNraQ+R0AHhvypZ0UiiODyWEAvbHJ0VzeV7chDW+8 I7Y4hcd75+ZkGjw8VWioRMyh7vnkN5Ue6hhaIWjJC/pFpfjd76psOqu/SPWU6YPnMMHF /alCEQgn2zLdmIhIGXIbVNqd1SzkDEj0ywqGhD5RobCYCPKeumSknjXsO4rQ/2tWS3zN 8PVn/Viwu99XGpznTAUu0Hby/wo+s3CH5Dw+PA5trBlkI7YI7JAA4iyD+ZdFRCE22npU bd6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=MBGH46Jr4wvrVpgPQJ0FMEXWJ0trnmysWdYdMG67Ie4=; b=NuRKf642BWMRRk9CiLaxMnfxTRYiAWzd7rBEMdh+oPfbUHlt2R+Nua+0Ca83PyIscX 0rUaBnfWskRkobq3GKH5PaI0IavqC1AZhRO8Xemia4MO0CCZUNq8crP5dwNDS5Bgd0Dr SVPp8g1INa2ZlFvCyrt8FdWUS9KExgvMVOnnAEoKTWt3QFmmrkjefh5S5/4GgWtsdmRO n/ojrh8XrE7ZHhm+XMcZEkYfO3adEbyJ3ZIGoqIW2sYGrPKhX5Gtidl+5itdNpIABsg4 aCzQzZgp1URmRfQo+cJRawIiMxkA3YR+Gykp8lqSOog0UTNqydh9MK3u2t1qBGTLIU16 DRZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1PapNgzR/9VBqcmv1z/KfDEm/8JNrj58mJJa84oWjWHEmE0jKV QdwtSYD+gdbneA8/WrEFOQLkiG0MCA1Wp/xwi4ZnvA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6kwYq5VPNW/sLF0FRe7CKOvzhdNSU4wjiPXTY7SnW4vQFNh64iMW5yHXmmJQCePwlObsO2L23bnQa7f7tggmM=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:c205:0:b0:38f:3eb7:5429 with SMTP id i5-20020a67c205000000b0038f3eb75429mr422845vsj.52.1661543930974; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220826062352.D7AF555D46@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CADTQi=eJZ0wPeu7o5_FLmsG_Wmm0cJAYWHrsrL-mwzSw7rDFFw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADTQi=eJZ0wPeu7o5_FLmsG_Wmm0cJAYWHrsrL-mwzSw7rDFFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lizzi Sassman <lizzi@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 21:58:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZSzfhzh8jCHL8Tqon4-Hwjnato24ndwzr83GTWRabHFpedWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gary Illyes <garyillyes@google.com>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Martijn Koster <m.koster@greenhills.co.uk>, Henner Zeller <henner@google.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, superuser@gmail.com, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c94b2005e72a57b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/Ar2F1jMWoGAc6f7JTgS_gCCoN8I>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:58:55 -0000

The draft LGTM.

Thanks,
Lizzi


On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:09 PM Gary Illyes <garyillyes@google.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your edits and review. Lizzi and I addressed the comments
> received and attached the updated XML to this email (also at
> https://github.com/google/robotstxt/blob/master/protocol-draft/rfc9309.xml
> )
>
> The draft attached looks good to me and from my perspective approved for
> publication.
>
> Martijn, Lizzi, Henner, please review this draft and provide feedback
> (probably on GitHub) and/or approval for publication.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:24 AM <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
>> *****IMPORTANT*****
>>
>> Updated 2022/08/25
>>
>> RFC Author(s):
>> --------------
>>
>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>>
>> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
>> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
>> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
>> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
>>
>> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
>> your approval.
>>
>> Planning your review
>> ---------------------
>>
>> Please review the following aspects of your document:
>>
>> *  RFC Editor questions
>>
>>    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
>>    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
>>    follows:
>>
>>    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
>>
>>    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
>>
>> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
>>
>>    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
>>    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
>>    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
>>
>> *  Content
>>
>>    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
>>    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>>    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>>    - contact information
>>    - references
>>
>> *  Copyright notices and legends
>>
>>    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>>    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>>    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
>>
>> *  Semantic markup
>>
>>    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
>>    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
>>    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
>>    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
>>
>> *  Formatted output
>>
>>    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
>>    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
>>    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
>>    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
>>
>>
>> Submitting changes
>> ------------------
>>
>> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all
>> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
>> include:
>>
>>    *  your coauthors
>>
>>    *  rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team)
>>
>>    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
>>       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
>>       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
>>
>>    *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list
>>       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
>>       list:
>>
>>      *  More info:
>>
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
>>
>>      *  The archive itself:
>>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
>>
>>      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
>>         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive
>> matter).
>>         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
>>         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
>>         auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and
>>         its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
>>
>> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>>
>> An update to the provided XML file
>>  — OR —
>> An explicit list of changes in this format
>>
>> Section # (or indicate Global)
>>
>> OLD:
>> old text
>>
>> NEW:
>> new text
>>
>> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
>> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
>>
>> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
>> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,
>> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in
>> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
>>
>>
>> Approving for publication
>> --------------------------
>>
>> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
>> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
>> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
>>
>>
>> Files
>> -----
>>
>> The files are available here:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.xml
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.html
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.pdf
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.txt
>>
>> Diff file of the text:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-diff.html
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>
>> Diff of the XML:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-xmldiff1.html
>>
>> The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own
>> diff files of the XML.
>>
>> Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.original.v2v3.xml
>>
>> XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates
>> only:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.form.xml
>>
>>
>> Tracking progress
>> -----------------
>>
>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9309
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Thank you for your cooperation,
>>
>> RFC Editor
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC9309 (draft-koster-rep-12)
>>
>> Title            : Robots Exclusion Protocol
>> Author(s)        : M. Koster, Ed., G. Illyes, Ed., H. Zeller, Ed., L.
>> Sassman, Ed.
>> WG Chair(s)      :
>> Area Director(s) :
>>
>>
>>