Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review

Gary Illyes <garyillyes@google.com> Fri, 26 August 2022 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <illyes@google.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6139C14F74C for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyY6fEMZx5in for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7851C14F73A for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id z16so1941916wrh.10 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=+/txYjyzHMl1uNEL09sZzMaOncj0zXkThSb4Rq4zrrI=; b=bhgQRoRUySTmsQ3XqU4qE2FuXY1l6sMLcwuJphFevtqw5Q9YhenYEYCBq77P7whRm1 WOi55giAyXIFQh4CxhQEK6oFV8VmMrmcDr9IbnapwNqEh0fFt9ykvVkgdErYVQjii5ka VHoFUMcy2Fk2xIid/OJFquDDhEhF3Io/WQIwR98mCIdg3x2C6Oses/B0AjHzL+AKuQeT TpB2YGAQEfIjncn4C4TqqbXksrFKVtxeVZh09ngVEvaWs2qdFBpnjF8U5ozbY0L+uWrr RwxXERTX3UQtD+dEDtL11jATJf9AxxXEShuj1rbZeJGJr2+zL6dcQGtbFgP2AsQpEkxu sbTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=+/txYjyzHMl1uNEL09sZzMaOncj0zXkThSb4Rq4zrrI=; b=7kBilXX1PsibfdjOSiUQMubX2zJPdtDDruEobGOaZiGZgEfadbu0fKJ3RpD8L3Ab/H WZYVp1FTE+yTcN+/Nb6d09FlF2WrHhZH07JeUJy/egZq2By+aW7BYroECOJv2AGl58fP 2gqAffDd8z+U1qfGZ8cGb1LFWYk1SW8JfjY8o6VMcvXkI96IkszZTLIDwtOew9EbspqG dFJbN3pyju9KJjztP2a1GLlRw/rFfz1t3pX2wKY0Gs2y6JlXX5vHmcjIouQwiq1HQ061 6koQ4wjYHarY4yxKM3i2apmutS4LDLd3jXxq2+6lK2BqDOn2Az3V+pJZCTGwNlWrje8t FiSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3SIlqG49EQy+cHI9e846sd8qntf5rF7xp8Kd1wsy6YiD8R7qNn NxUSD0W3mCNY21ZJ+hTVzt+dvJnp7SSv9nkbg2A/2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5RNHtvbOJJ3GJ5fuZTmZXEAtgjmZOV9kG84BygZb/TFe2xJBcjjQ26+UfZdn+MCrtGgG9FJFlTYAeALBgP1dc=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:47a1:0:b0:225:6290:2533 with SMTP id 1-20020a5d47a1000000b0022562902533mr4752640wrb.545.1661522945886; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220826062352.D7AF555D46@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220826062352.D7AF555D46@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Gary Illyes <garyillyes@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:08:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CADTQi=eJZ0wPeu7o5_FLmsG_Wmm0cJAYWHrsrL-mwzSw7rDFFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, m.koster@greenhills.co.uk, henner@google.com, lizzi@google.com
Cc: ted.ietf@gmail.com, superuser@gmail.com, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000fb09e005e72574d6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/oPB0nQBU_CPn-vMOKQFhllIAjpg>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9309 <draft-koster-rep-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:09:13 -0000

Thank you for your edits and review. Lizzi and I addressed the comments
received and attached the updated XML to this email (also at
https://github.com/google/robotstxt/blob/master/protocol-draft/rfc9309.xml)

The draft attached looks good to me and from my perspective approved for
publication.

Martijn, Lizzi, Henner, please review this draft and provide feedback
(probably on GitHub) and/or approval for publication.


On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:24 AM <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> *****IMPORTANT*****
>
> Updated 2022/08/25
>
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
>
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
>
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
> your approval.
>
> Planning your review
> ---------------------
>
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
>
> *  RFC Editor questions
>
>    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
>    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
>    follows:
>
>    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
>
>    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
>
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
>
>    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
>    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
>    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
>
> *  Content
>
>    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
>    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>    - contact information
>    - references
>
> *  Copyright notices and legends
>
>    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
>
> *  Semantic markup
>
>    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
>    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
>    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
>    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
>
> *  Formatted output
>
>    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
>    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
>    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
>    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
>
>
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
>
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
> include:
>
>    *  your coauthors
>
>    *  rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team)
>
>    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
>       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
>       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
>
>    *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list
>       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
>       list:
>
>      *  More info:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
>
>      *  The archive itself:
>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
>
>      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
>         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
>         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
>         auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and
>         its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
>
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>
> An update to the provided XML file
>  — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
>
> Section # (or indicate Global)
>
> OLD:
> old text
>
> NEW:
> new text
>
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
>
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,
> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in
> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
>
>
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
>
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
>
>
> Files
> -----
>
> The files are available here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.xml
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.pdf
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.txt
>
> Diff file of the text:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-diff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>
> Diff of the XML:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309-xmldiff1.html
>
> The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own
> diff files of the XML.
>
> Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.original.v2v3.xml
>
> XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates
> only:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9309.form.xml
>
>
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
>
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9309
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation,
>
> RFC Editor
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9309 (draft-koster-rep-12)
>
> Title            : Robots Exclusion Protocol
> Author(s)        : M. Koster, Ed., G. Illyes, Ed., H. Zeller, Ed., L.
> Sassman, Ed.
> WG Chair(s)      :
> Area Director(s) :
>
>
>