RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?ch
sporetsky@quarrytech.com Mon, 04 October 2004 21:43 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29218 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 17:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CEaJp-0004rp-Va; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:24:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CEZNO-0002z0-R2 for bmwg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:24:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13873 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:24:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: sporetsky@quarrytech.com
Received: from email.quarrytech.com ([4.17.144.4] helo=qtech1.quarrytech.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEZWY-0007x5-0M for bmwg@ietf.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:33:34 -0400
Received: by email.quarrytech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <N87XZ8ST>; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:23:35 -0400
Message-ID: <496A8683261CD211BF6C0008C733261A04D3B017@email.quarrytech.com>
To: riw@cisco.com, sporetsky@quarrytech.com
Subject: RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?ch
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:23:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: hcb@gettcomm.com, jim.mcquaid@netiq.com, bmwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org
There is definitely a context in which it would be useful to discuss the value of working "general" testing papers to become RFC. However, I do not consider your paper to cover "general" testing. I believe it is specific to measuring network convergence when there are hundreds of nodes. While being open minded to considering this work item I am wary about the BMWG becoming an orphanage for rejected IEEE test papers. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Russ White [mailto:ruwhite@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:51 PM To: sporetsky@quarrytech.com Cc: jim.mcquaid@netiq.com; hcb@gettcomm.com; bmwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?ch > As interesting as this paper is, I always found it to be a tough fit for > the BMWG. This proposed work item has no related terminology or > methodology draft. The tests are not clearly described in the paper and > refer to the need to simulate hundreds of nodes for a lab benchmark test. > I went through the thread from last April '04 (6 months ago) and read > numerous responses in objection to this becoming a work item. My mind is > open to be changed so can you please clearly explain what is being > benchmarked, how it is being benchmarked, and why you think this is > appropriate for the BMWG. I suppose the question comes down to this: Is it worth having informational documents that provide general background and knoweldge gained from experience to people writing other testing documents, and actually running tests? Is the only thing the WG can publish actual tests, or can it also publish documents explaining how to test, in general, and other work in the area of benchmarking? I would think informational documents about how to test in general, about methods and mechanisms, would also be useful. :-) Russ __________________________________ riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Jim McQuaid
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? scott bradner
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… sporetsky
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… sporetsky
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Jim McQuaid
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… sporetsky
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Michele Bustos
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… sporetsky
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… sporetsky
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Michele Bustos
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Jim McQuaid
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Robert Holley (rholley)
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… sporetsky
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? scott bradner
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? David Newman
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? scott bradner
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D… Russ White
- RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D? Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)